You’re an idiot liberal. Deal with it.
Oooo... aren't you smart! Can't think outside the Hegelian box the socialists made for you.
I'm no liberal. I never said I opposed right to work laws. I don't. It's you who's the collectivist here: You want the public to protect collectivized investments with minimized accountability, while refusing workers the very same right to a free association no different than among stockholders. You want to socialize the risks and privatize the benefits of your investments. A classic double standard.
I don't want EITHER side to have monopoly or even oligopoly power. I prefer FULLY private free enterprise, in other words, with real accountability via laws governed by natural law competition among the several States and not by the Feds, the latter being effectively one stop shopping for corruption. I want human beings to have rights superior to any association, union or corporate. You simply lack the vision to understand the distinctions or the solutions I posited, stuck in your bull-headed rut labeling anyone who disagrees with you a "liberal." Well here's reality turkey, your corporate game was instituted by a communist, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Clerk of the Supreme Court, a Republican, and a Marxist when he added a bogus headnote to the decision of the Court in Santa Clara v. Southern Pacific.
Yeah, I know, you don't get it, Hegel's got your brain by the lobes. Yet corporate socialism and Marxism both comprise a system devised and funded by some of the richest bankers in Europe. Hence, you are the leftist here, you just don't know it.
“You’re an idiot liberal. Deal with it.”
Perhaps you are getting a tad excited, Doctor. Take a tranquilizer and once it takes effect consider the following:
1. Whatever Carry_Okie may be, an idiot he assuredly isn’t. Hint, think standards of deviation above normal, more than just one, too.
2. Remember what Darbyshire said about life being an IQ test?
3. Carry_Okie is a master of multi-disciplinary arguments, though he (and I) tend to prefer the more correct term ‘hypothesis’.
4. The issue of corporations is a complex one, loaded with intellectual traps, an issue where things really are not as they seem.
5. In the instant case of Hostess v. Goonion, the Chinese have a saying about only a foolish man breaks his own rice bowl.
6. Thanks to Big Gubbamnet, the strikers can collect unemployment even though they are unemployed by the consequences of their own acts.