They should use the unionRAT labor to pack up the plants lock, stock and barrel, and ship it to the new locations in the right to work states.
(of course they wouldn't want to tell the morons)
It is against federal law to move a production location to avoid the use of union labor.
It happens all the time, of course. But there has to be another compelling reason that can be used to justify the move. I've been involved in such a move -- from Illinois to Alabama -- and the reason we used was "take advantage of efficiencies by being closer to the source of raw materials".
But a transparent move to avoid union labor is sure trouble with the feds. Moreso now than it was then, I'm sure. Ask Boeing...