Skip to comments.
Why can’t/won’t Petraeus testify?
Hotair ^
Posted on 11/09/2012 4:55:44 PM PST by chessplayer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: chessplayer; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows
After this disclosure, is the broad well?
2
posted on
11/09/2012 4:57:27 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
To: chessplayer
1,2,3 this thread will be shut down for asking the same question.
To: chessplayer
Well now this makes sense.
4
posted on
11/09/2012 4:58:23 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: chessplayer
He may testify but they had to destroy him first. It’s obvious.
5
posted on
11/09/2012 4:58:53 PM PST
by
Andrei Bulba
(No Obama, no way!)
To: chessplayer
Remember the guy whose video supposedly provoked the attacks on our middle-east embassies?
Where is he now"
'Nuff said.
6
posted on
11/09/2012 4:59:23 PM PST
by
elkfersupper
( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
To: chessplayer
More people falling off the turnip truck.
7
posted on
11/09/2012 4:59:34 PM PST
by
throwback
(The object of opening the mind, is as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
To: chessplayer
Cong Peter King said they need Petraeus testimony or their Benghazi investigation will be incomplete.
One way or another, I think he will testify.
8
posted on
11/09/2012 4:59:42 PM PST
by
Red Steel
To: chessplayer
Good question. So what if he had an affair. The Benghazzi affair takes precedence. Congress should subpoena him.
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: Andrei Bulba
He may testify but they had to destroy him first. Its obvious. It didn't destroy Clinton back in 98. Remember the 1998 MSM/Clinton meme of "sex doesn't matter".
To: chessplayer
Because he cares about his family?
To: chessplayer
For his own sake, I hope he avoids canoes at all costs in the next few weeks.
13
posted on
11/09/2012 5:02:50 PM PST
by
A. Patriot
(Re-electing Obama is like the Titanic backing up to hit the iceberg again.)
To: chessplayer
I may be wrong about this, but I believe he can no longer be compelled to testify before a Congressional committee if he’s no longer a Federal appointee. I don’t think Congress can just hand a subpoena to Joe Q. Citizen on the street and make him go to Washington to testify in a Congressional hearing.
14
posted on
11/09/2012 5:02:53 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
To: chessplayer
Do you really think a 4 Star married 47 years was screwing some journalist? Really? He resigned in protest over Benghazi and zero won’t allow it.
15
posted on
11/09/2012 5:03:01 PM PST
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: chessplayer
Wire him up. An eighty vote bell ringer circuit strategically placed ought to do the trick.
16
posted on
11/09/2012 5:04:08 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: chessplayer
I don’t know, but as a private citizen he can simply plead the Fifth Amendment, I believe.
17
posted on
11/09/2012 5:04:08 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: chessplayer
I'm no Constitutional scholar but I would think that the House and Senate have the power to subpoena *any* US citizen.I suppose there may be cases where the hearings would have to be classified (closed to the press and public) however.I smell an end around by a loyal disciple of Saul Alinsky himself.
18
posted on
11/09/2012 5:04:35 PM PST
by
Gay State Conservative
(Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
To: Red Steel
He won’t testify. He will be somewhere extremely remote “reconnecting” with his family.
19
posted on
11/09/2012 5:04:58 PM PST
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: chessplayer
Either he wants to live or he has loved ones.
20
posted on
11/09/2012 5:05:53 PM PST
by
null and void
(The One can steal an election, but no one can steal our country.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson