To: Behind Liberal Lines
Ridiculous. If this happens, there will be immediate bills (by dems) to make it permanent. After all, if such voting could be cobbled into existence within a few days and had been carried out “ without a hitch,” there’s no reason not to make it a permanent option.
9 posted on
11/04/2012 7:41:02 PM PST by
Sgt_Schultze
(A half-truth is a complete lie)
To: Sgt_Schultze
Ridiculous. If this happens, there will be immediate bills (by dems) to make it permanent. After all, if such voting could be cobbled into existence within a few days and had been carried out “ without a hitch,” there’s no reason not to make it a permanent option. Bingo.
12 posted on
11/04/2012 7:49:01 PM PST by
null and void
(Day 1384 of the Obama hostage crisis - Barack Hussein Obama an enemy BOTH foreign AND domestic)
To: Sgt_Schultze
“Ridiculous. If this happens, there will be immediate bills (by dems) to make it permanent. After all, if such voting could be cobbled into existence within a few days and had been carried out “ without a hitch,” there’s no reason not to make it a permanent option.”
Presactly. This isn’t about NJ (that state is voting 0 no matter). It’s about the terrible precedent.
To: Sgt_Schultze
Ridiculous. If this happens, there will be immediate bills (by dems) to make it permanent. On the up side Ron Paul will being every email election 99% to 1% from that point out.
28 posted on
11/04/2012 8:55:28 PM PST by
Mad_as_heck
(The MSM - America's (domestic) public enemy #1.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson