A Romney debate win means nothing. Kerry won the first debate in 2004 and he still lost.
The betting markets still view Bamster as a prohibitive favorite. A lot of people on here and the conservative lumenproletariat are making it out to be more than they want to be.
That may just be wishful thinking at work.
1 posted on Thursday, October 04, 2012 2:26:53 AM by Nachum
To funny, that picture made me howl.
As an amateur psychologist who deals with two narcissists in the workplace, a couple opinions.
Although by definition these folks have a higher than appropriate opinion of their bottom line abilities, I’ve found with the two I know that they are actually below average in all aspects of performance.
When there is little or nothing to be gained for themselves personally, these people are inherently very lazy at their core. Obama’s internals could be telling him he is very likely to lose. He won’t be putting any real effort into any of the debates if that’s the case.
To all of those who have been wearing skirts and not kilts over the polling......I love it when a plan comes together.
The socialists will be scratching their collective heads for the next 18 years.
To Obama’s surprise, voting “Present” at a debate is not enough.
There was a certain brilliance to the Daily Caller release of the video showing Obama as he really is a day before this debate.
It took away the use of the 47% BS. Obama knew that Romney could simply bring up that video and show who really doesn’t like over 50% of voters.
People could argue here at FR that many people haven’t seen that video of Obama. That may well be true, but O’s team knew that if the video came up, everyone would want to see it.