You don't get what I'm saying do you? I'm saying that the "shouting fire" rule is itself a bogus piece of crap that exists only to justify restrictions contrary the constitution. I want no exceptions in the hands of the government. None.
The severe personal insult of, say, vet families being harassed by people dishonoring the flag and the soldier which results in violence ought to be relegated to the jury. The whole point of the jury is to judge both the person and the law; the jury has always had (and indeed must have) the power to judge one innocent contrary to "the letter of the law". No exception to Constitutionally guaranteed rights is needed and, in fact, the solution I presents is the exercise of one such right: the 6th amendment.
I thought I was agreeing with you, but whatever.