[conservaterian]

Sorry, I give this guy no break for his politics. If he published details that were secret and subject to a non-disclosure then he is a traitor and should be prosecuted as such. If he did not, then the Pentagon should stay out of it.

[RadiationRomeo]

I agree with you conservaterian. If the non-disclosure agreements are still binding then he is in breach of contract. If he knowingly disclosed secrets then he is a traitor.

Eventually we will get the real facts of this case.

[ravenwolf]

Sorry, I give this guy no break for his politics. If he published details that were secret and subject to a non-disclosure then he is a traitor and should be prosecuted as such. If he did not, then the Pentagon should stay out of it.

---

I have a feeling that the administration is concerned more about what the American people will find out by reading the book rather than what any enemies may find.

So if the guy is writing the book for money alone then i may agree but if he is writing it to get the truth to the American people then i say go,go,go,

This country does not belong to the s.o.b.s in washington who are in my opinion nothing but whores, it belongs to the American people.

It is a done deal so what is wrong with us knowing the truth about it?

[stormer]

Me neither. One my cronies is a retired SF O-6. He quoted me chapter and verse on this guy's responsibilities and made it clear in no uncertain terms that this guy f’ed up and the DOD ain't going to take it lightly.