In a case like this the only evidence that really matters is the scientific evidence. It's either there or it isn't. If it was there how did he "get away with it" for SEVEN wins, the last of which is some six years ago now?
Seems a bit ridiculous. He's fully retired now so who cares if he's "banned for life?" He won; it happened. Never a fan of the sport, I'm as sick of hearing about him as ever.
Let's return to our regularly scheduled Todd Akin topic. /s
I bet old Lance wishes he just stayed retired.