Oh, I fully understand their position. They are right - and they don’t need evidence, they are so VERY right!
As I have stated elsewhere, if there is sufficient physical evidence to substantiate the allegations, Armstrong deserves punishment. If not, he does not.
But, in justice, the process is the product.
If physical evidence is the standard for guilt or innocence, Jerry Sandusky is innocent in your mind, right?
Eye-witness testimony is evidence, and I think Armstrong knew that evidence was overwhelmingly against him.
The best thing to come out of this latest fiasco is that Greg Lemond is vindicated. The Armstrong smear machine really did a job on Lemond over the years. If there’s any justice Lemond will regain his status as the greatest American cyclist.