It’s amusing to see you try to read my mind, when you apparently can’t even read my posts.
To my understanding - and if I am incorrect (based on the actual rules for detecting doping, as opposed to opinions about the rules) I will freely admit it - that hearsay evidence is not the standard for stripping titles. Physical evidence is required. If you have information to the contrary, please provide a link so I can educate myself.
You really should look up the definition of ad hominem. Repeatedly attacking someone just because they have a differing opinion is so very liberal. Try attacking the actual substance of the debate, and perhaps you will have a modicum of success.
Obviously it has been proven to the people who made the decison to ban and strip him.OBVIOUSLY
You seem to think that everyday life is like the inside of a courtroom. This is not a reasonable doubt case.
Why would they want to ban and strip him unjustly?