Posted on 08/11/2012 5:32:45 AM PDT by beebuster2000
You people are trying to doom us to another four years of OBama with these picks.
See my post #113. Agree on this? Sure. But look at his pedigree. Sheesh. What baggage...
I like Paul Ryan. I don’t like neutering his legislative effectiveness by tying him to a Liberal President. Actually, I expect the kenyan to win another term, anyway, so it doesn’t really matter. Romney can still surprise me, I suppose. People keep saying he is conserving his ammo until after the convention after which he will let go with the heavy artillery. That is the same thing we heard when Bush I was running for his first term as himself rather than as Reagan Redux. It never happened. Bush I held his fire right up to the Election. And how effective is it when a CPA fires both barrels? Romney seems to be in the tradition of Ford-BushI-Dole-McCain.
———you people———
I’m white
I’m relevant
Ryan out of the way where he can be controlled during the campaign will not be able to speak out against the excesses planned by Obama.
That pretty much gives it away to the Democrats.
So what ~ if you put Obama back in office it wouldn’t matter if you were green and $100,000 banknotes printed on your skin.
It seems you believe you have taken a principled stand and are not moving from your position. Fine. Stay in your own stink.
No, that was a yak yapping. You know, Yak, yak, yak, yak...with nothing to say but "Yak".
LOL!
Yak yak yak...
Let’s go further, Landon, Willkie, Dewey, Nixon (First Run), Goldwater, Ford, BushI, Dole, McCain ~ that’s pretty much the list of GOP-e candidates ~ and they all lost.
Who cares.
Romney celebrates his free to $50 abortions in his health plan.
He is not prolife, these groups caved because they have obamahysteria
Ryan delivered a very heartfelt speech.
I wanted Newt or West, but .... I like Ryan — overall a good choice IMO.
Just because you don’t believe Romney has converted to Pro-Life, and you doubt his sincerity in introducing Ryan as Pro-Life, doesn’t mean we’re obligated to share your doubt.
How about you quit bothering us and we’ll quit bothering you.
You’re not changing anyone’s mind here.
And you’re so biased, facts won’t persuade.
Don’t bother posting your list of Romney’s past sins.
The only thing that is important is how Romney will govern in the future.
His selection of Ryan, makes clear his commitment to the conservative wing of the party.
I’m predicting the Slow Joe will be replaced, sooner than later. He may even be Walpin’d to get him out.
DNC knows that Biden v Ryan will be a disaster.
I think Ryan is a good choice as he has some fire in his belly and is smart enough to run rings around Obama’s minions on Obamacare and anything to do with budgets. Pawlenty was too milquetoast. We need Rubio in the Senate and Jindal needs more experience and maybe a term in Congress.
This is not a Republican board. Romney would best show his adherence to Conservative principles by getting out of the way!
Ryan voted for TARP.
I like a lot of his ideas but that’s a deal breaker for me.
I’m fine with Ryan. Fiscal conservative and a burr under the DNC’s saddle.
Your logic eludes me.
To what purpose do you even bother to post here, when your time could be better spent preparing for TEOTWAWKI, which Obama will surely bring about after winning re-election with the help of nay-sayers like yourself?
Frankly, I’m not even going to bother reading your driveling reply, so there’s no real reason to answer, although I doubt you’ll pass on the opportunity to blither some more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.