[Conscience of a Conservative]

Since he obviously did not have a release signed by the Chick-Fil-A employee, can she not sue him for posting the video online?

Probably not. This guy did not post/sell this video for commercial purposes, so he likely did not need a release to do so.

[catman67]

In Maryland he would have committed a felony by doing so!

[MamaTexan]

This guy did not post/sell this video for commercial purposes, so he likely did not need a release to do so.

Not that I really know, but -

He posted it publicly, obviously looking for public recognition, so the argument could be made that commercial purposes could have resulted from the video, despite the fact it was not initially for commercial intent.

------

In other words, had his (totally delusional) plan of Internet fame been successful, he would have been fay-mus!

:-)