Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kansas58; butterdezillion; MHGinTN
Kansas58, calling butterdezillion 'pompous' seems to be an exercise in projection on your part. It's also unjustified. Let me assure you that butter is far from alone. More and more people are shaking off their normalcy biases and recognizing that the simultaneous failures of the rule of law, jurisprudence, checks and balances, and media vigilance and impartiality are real. The failure to vet Obama the candidate or modulate Obama the president are just some of the symptoms. These failures are consistent with a systematic and treasonous attack on our government and culture from within. The attack started with Article II Section 1, but clearly has proceeded far beyond it in the last three plus years (some would say one hundred years).
143 posted on 07/31/2012 7:50:28 PM PDT by Hetuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Hetuck

Thank you.

People really are waking up to the lawlessness, which is the major reason I care about this issue. So many laws have been broken. Now that the lawlessness has become more blatant in other areas people ARE seeing it for what it is, and I think it has shaken some people out of their sleep on this issue too.

It means a lot to me that before he died - in fact, less than 5 hours before he died - Andrew Breitbart acknowledged the validity of this issue in a phone conversation with Sheriff Joe Arpaio. His objection had always been that there wasn’t enough evidence and nobody had standing to get evidence, but he sought out Arpaio to learn about the evidence and was willing to receive it when he heard it. That’s skepticism that I can respect. Breitbart could have shocked the world if he had been able to make so much as one public comment in support of Arpaio’s investigation and findings; he died before the sun could even rise after his “conversion” on this issue.


148 posted on 07/31/2012 8:11:53 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

To: Hetuck; butterdezillion; MHGinTN
Let me get this straight:

I am accused of using a “argument from authority” -— even though it is, to any normal person, ridiculous to make legal arguments that nobody will listen to but your fringe birther types.

However, “Jesus” is used to, somehow, prove me wrong?

Can you think of a higher authority?

I am guessing that Jesus is a bit irritated in His name being used in such careless fashion.

In fact, I think there is a Commandment against such misuse.

You Birthers need to give it up.

You have no legal basis for your claims.

152 posted on 07/31/2012 8:26:31 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson