Skip to comments.EXCLUSIVE: PALIN STARS IN TV AD FOR MISSOURI SENATE CANDIDATE SARAH STEELMAN
Posted on 07/30/2012 2:48:41 PM PDT by smoothsailing
July 30, 2012
In the ad, which is titled Momma Grizzly," Palin, who recently endorsed Steelman, says we can get American back on track by sending true conservatives like Steelman to Washington.
Sarah is an economist who defends our tax dollars like a mama grizzly defends her cubs, Palin says, noting that Steelman also earned a reputation as a conservative maverick by blocking pork-barrel spending.
Palin also says that [Steelman] will fight for a constitutional amendment that forces Congress to balance the budget.
Steelman, in the ad, says she is running because the status quo has to go.
Steelman told Breitbart News that Palin is one of the strongest conservative leaders in the country who remains steadfast battling for what is right despite the personal attacks from the liberal left" and someone who isn't afraid to take on the status quo as she fights to return the power of government to the people where it belongs.
I respect and admire her, Steelman said, noting she was also honored and excited that Governor Palin has endorsed me for U.S. Senate.
[Palin] believes we need people with a strong backbone willing to fight for what is right, Steelman said. She knows I will cut government spending, balance the budget and get government out of the way.".....
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I guess the check cleared.
LOL, you’re quick, I was just getting ready to ping you! ;-)
I just happened to spot your wonderful posting!
Thanks very much!!! GO SARAH!
I hope Sarah loses (Steelman, that is not Palin.)
And the right candidate is ... drum roll ... ?
I see your PDS is getting better. But you only moved from one self-described ‘implication’ to another. Neither of which you can back up.
Tell us Gunner, why do you hate her so much? Of all the pols out there you are fixated on the one who holds the most conservative views, Is lockstep with FR’s mission statement, and enjoys broad support within conservative circles.
So fess up. What rational reason do you have for all the vitrol?
My impression is that when Sarah Palin chooses the “wrong” candidate, she usually has good reasons for it.
I take it you support either Brunner or Akin. It’s my understanding that any one of the three Republicans(Steelman,Akin,Brunner) can beat McCaskill in November.
You’re lucky, here in Pennsylvania we’re going to have a heck of a time getting rid of Bob Casey.
If you are against Steelman you should mention why rather than just troll her thread.
That pic gets a big ol’ LIKE from me! Some people just cannot resist the temptation to put her down, no matter what.
Bummer...I like Brunner
Hi sweet you!
I love that picture of her too!
Never heard of her.
rather than just troll her thread
HER thread? Really?
Looky here, Spanky. I'm just making light of a media figure.
Have you a problem with that?
Jumping on a Senate race thread to hijack it as a troll when you aren’t even interested in the race or the conservative candidate being advanced, is the perfect example of trolling.
The irony of the blog cop bitching about bloggers using FR to get attention to their non original content, then hopping on various Palin threads to add nothing original and get attention is just too rich.
Must have. Best money Steelman could spend, as Steelman will win.
Is that what this is? See the title:
PALIN STARS IN TV AD
I would think that invites criticism of the "Star".
I'm dreadfully sorry if you disagree.
Yeah I see it, it was my introduction to this Senate race, the same as it was for you, but instead of you seeing a Senate race and conservative politics, you wanted to hijack the thread and turn it away from the Senate race and into your troll thing against Palin.
Really? How so? Does saying “Water is wet” ‘invite criticzm of the clouds?
Or is it just because Palin appeared in the ad/article? Would you have criticized, say, Jim DeMint if the article was about him in a commercial? I doubt it. You just have some kind of fetish with Palin.
See your doctor of your infatuation with idiotic onliners lasts more than 4 hours.
I can’t. I just love pointing out your hypocracy too much. The last 4 or 5 get-togethers have done so much for your credibility.
All you have to do is stop the DU style and extremely unconservative attacks on Palin and there’s no problem.
Trolls crave the attention, they seek it no matter where or how, it is too bad that a useful thread like this gets walked on though.
Thats why I get so miffed. Gunner and the rest of the PDS brigade go out of their way to troll and disrupt, then just head off like nothing ever happened. And then rides off to a blog thread like he was the town sheriff.
And as you see, he gets REAL upset when he’s called out on his BS. He can’t defend it. So he tells me to STFU.
I tremble before such stunning intellect.
Probably not, given his term-finishing credentials.
I've yet to see him prancing about trying to be "all that".
Nobody has been making a God of DeMint so I'm less critical of him.
I couldn’t even comprehend disrespecting a fellow FReeper.
Just as a side note I want to mention that many of the PDSers who spent months on FR ripping her to shreds are now upset that we have Mitt Romney for the presumptive nominee.
Perhaps if they had gotten behind her rather than attack and mock her with the very words and tactics of the left, we ‘could’ have a far more viable candidate. They wish we would forget that inconvenient truth. But they slagged and propagandized their way into a less qualified candidate. And now we all have to suffer for it.
We should point that out...and thank them...often.
"Called Out"? That's cute. You mean when someone disagrees.
That isn't "called out" bud. And it ain't my job to teach you what is.
It's evident to all how weepy you get when anyone questions Palin.
That's fine, weep all you want. Weep all damned day.
Fact is, your girl hasn't the juevos to run for anything
and it makes you terribly sad to realize it. Here's a tissue.
I’m not familiar with “humblegunner”. Are you a known disrupter? You’ve irritated 3 or 4 people on this thread. Is this a habit of yours?
I started to go back and check your posting history, but I thought it best just to ask you directly.
What’s your beef, freeper?
Your help in ensuring a Romney candidacy is surely appreciated. And I am sure that undermining a person who articulates the majority of our beliefs as conservatives will help more conservatives take up the cause knowing there are people like you willing to mock them and stab them in the back every chance they get.
And thank God the next time the left and the GOP decide to undermine a Governor or other pol somewhere (and sue/file frivolous ethics charges against them and their staff, costing lots of out of pocket dollars) out of office, they can count on conservative thinkers such as yourself to give them all the cover they need.
Be proud of what you helped accomplished.
You do need to review his post history. It will tell you all you need to know. Of course some of his more vitrolic posts RE Palin were pulled, but there’s plenty to show you the kind of person he is.
I feel sad for you.
Let me know when you have the “juevos” to run for anything. I doubt we’ll ever see that, because it would take time away from you being an annoying ass on FR.
Would you root for me because I can read a speech you agree with?
Is that all it takes?
Lucky for Steelman...I hated to miss Sarah P. in The Woodlands....if she can do for Sarah Steelman what she’s doing for Cruz, then full steam ahead!!
So which of Palin’s speeches do you disagree with?
Lets hear it. What part of her conservative thought, ideal and philosophy offends you so?
Or are you upset that she helps actual conservatives get more votes than they would on their own? Kinda weird to be upset with a parson like that. Well, not for a Party hack or a lib. But inexplicable for a conservative to feel that way.
Hey, Cap'n... the primaries are over.
Had you noticed?
I saw today that Cruz is polling 10 points up on Dewhurst! WOO-HOO!
Go Ted, Sarah, and Sarah! ;-)
A troll hijacked your thread, but while the discussion of the Senate race was killed off, at least we were introduced to Steelman and the race.
Keep us up to date on Steelman’s progress if you can.
They are! and thanks to you and others spouting the MSM/DU attacks, we ended up with Romney. You remember don’t you? while Palin was still a possibility, people like you eere on web sites and social media ‘implying’ she was a prostitute’ and other wholly untrue things that surely impacted her decision?
And I’m sure that no other conservative looked at their own party turning on her and had second thoughts about their own political intentions.....nooooo....
So we got a flaming liberal. Thanks for the help brain surgeon.
Sorry tubby but I didn't vote for him.
He has magic underpants and that's a deal killer,
You remember dont you? while Palin was still a possibility
Was she really? How many dollars did you toss at that stripper?
implying she was a prostitute and other wholly untrue things that surely impacted her decision?
If she was basing her actions on me, she's ate up with the dumbass.
But take heart, you can always swoon over Todd in his upcoming reality show.
Yep. As sad as one can feel for a box of rocks for a brain.......
Cruz' campaign has said that Sarah's endorsement helped send donations up significantly AND helped with his popularity.
I'm just learning about her myself. She's quite attractive. She must have Claire McCaskill worried sick. No doubt McCaskill would prefer to run against a man she could demonize. That gets a little tougher to do against another woman.
As for the troll, they've been around FR since Day One and we're still standing.