[faucetman]

The Churchill bust in the residence has NOTHING to do with the fact that Obama refused the offer by the Brits to keep the loaner bust. One has nothing to do with the other. The one given as a GIFT (not loan) during the Johnson administration was never at issue. The Bush administration bust was not loaned because of repairs to the other bust. it was not a replacement for the other bust, temporary or otherwise. This is just SMOKE from the Obozo administration trying to cover up Obozo’s hatred for the Brits, since they were caught.

[Houghton M.]

Read the stories. U R Confused. The stories say both of these. You are sure which of the two versions about the loaner, repairs, etc. is right.

But that means you are choosing among the bits pieces of the stories because what I wrote is in the stupid stories.

Read the stories.

Read the stories.

Read the stories.

Read the stories.

Then give some hard evidence as to just which of the conflicting stories is true.

[Houghton M.]

Where was the Johnson bust in July 2001?

Why was Bush given a “loaner”?

Did the US have two identical busts from 2001-2009? Where was each kept.

There may be perfectly good answers to these questions and Zero may be the total goat in all this.

But the stories floating around, none of them from 2009 onward make any of this clear. There was spin going on already in the 2009 stories and some it seems to have been coming from our side, is the conclusion I draw, at this stage.