Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sola Veritas
The Aurora shooter carried an AR-15.

Does any military in the world buy, or even consider this weapon to meet their specifications for a military assault rifle?

118 posted on 07/26/2012 6:50:14 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

“The Aurora shooter carried an AR-15. Does any military in the world buy, or even consider this weapon to meet their specifications for a military assault rifle?”

Yes, the AR-15 is just a civilian designation for our M-16 series of rifles (probably very similiar to the M16A2). The only main diffence is that the civilian version will only fire in semi-auto mode.

Therefore, the AR-15 is a military grade weapon and specifically protected by the 2nd Ammendment under the term “Arms” as it was intended.

The founders were very suspicious of standing “regulars” and prefered an armed citizenry that could be called upon for militia duty. Even though, for the most part, we have lost our distrust in “regulars”, the 2nd Ammendment still stands and cannot just be conveinently ignored by revisionists. IF they want to take away “assault rifles” from civilians, then it would, IMO, require the repeal of the 2nd. That is not going to happen. Should that day come it were repealed, that would be the total end of America.

For as the bumper sticker reads:

“An armed man is a citizen, while an unarmed one is a subject.”


125 posted on 07/26/2012 8:42:23 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson