Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama talks of limiting some gun use in wake of Colorado massacre
FoxNews ^ | July 25, 2012 | FoxNews

Posted on 07/25/2012 8:10:49 PM PDT by Innovative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 last
To: FlingWingFlyer
Someone needs to send the Kenyan ***hole a copy of the Bill of Rights.

Wouldn't help. Communists/statists just can't get their head around it. Better to just bury them in the "ashbin of history".

161 posted on 07/26/2012 4:13:06 PM PDT by Max in Utah (A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: StevieRay20
"And no true American would have an AK-47, the communist weapon of choice."

Actually, many American contemporary and prior real combat soldiers (the kind who do thousands of patrol and ambush drills and fire quite a variety of weapons for many hours on ranges--far less than 5% of all military personnel) prefer to own semi-automatic AK-47s.

I don't prefer either in general. Semi-auto AK-47 variants and AR-15 variants each have their better attributes.

But FNs are downright too ugly. ;-) [Wife will bark at me for that, because she used them in her service.]


162 posted on 07/26/2012 5:51:19 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Another fine theory dreamt up by some goof who assumed civility on the part of our enemies....

I like the description, posted by a New Zealander on a Youtube video, from his veteran RSM who took part in Operation Claret in Malaysia in the early 1960s...he said you could always tell the difference between a “nog” who got shot with an AR-15 and one who got shot with an L1A1...the ones shot with the AR would slump forward and into the boat (that they were using to infiltrate)...the ones shot with the 7.62 NATO round of the L1A1 would fly backwards and OUT of the boat!


163 posted on 07/26/2012 6:58:52 PM PDT by M1903A1 ("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy... and call it progress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: familyop

That’s why we have M14s...or M1As, take your pic. ;-)


164 posted on 07/26/2012 7:07:16 PM PDT by M1903A1 ("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy... and call it progress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: M1903A1

Great rifles...at huge prices, though.


165 posted on 07/26/2012 7:57:17 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Quality costs.


166 posted on 07/26/2012 8:39:54 PM PDT by M1903A1 ("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy... and call it progress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

167 posted on 07/26/2012 9:38:51 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: StevieRay20
And no true American would have an AK-47, the communist weapon of choice.

I'm an Afghanistan and Iraq veteran (military member 15+ yrs), and I have a collection of the things and really like them.

Can't help that the commies made a rugged, dependable weapon.

168 posted on 07/26/2012 9:47:04 PM PDT by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Sometimes it’s ok to politicize a tragedy, right?

Just when Democrats do it, of course.

Because they care.

/s


169 posted on 07/27/2012 3:56:55 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

“The 2nd Ammendment protects the right of individual citizens to have “military” type arms like “assault” rifles. Any other reading of the language would be ridiculous.”

You’re correct. The USSC decision in “Miller” clearly states that the 2nd Amendment is meant to protect civilian possession of military type weapons.


170 posted on 07/27/2012 5:41:25 AM PDT by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry bear formerly known as..........Ursus Arctos Horribilis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Damn right!


171 posted on 07/30/2012 10:50:53 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson