Golly, they're still not sure if he did it?
Doncha' just love the way these legalisms strangle us everyday. Guess they're still not sure if he had the weapon, nor if he was the one who actually used it.
Whom else do they have as a suspect?
***Doncha’ just love the way these legalisms strangle us everyday.***
I remember when George Wallace was shot by Arthur Bremer. The whole thing was caught on film but he was still the “alleged” shooter till after the trial.
I don’t remember if Jack Ruby was also referred to as the “alleged” shooter of Lee Harvey Oswald, or if Oswald was referred to as the “alleged” shooter of John Kennedy.
I get your point, but in America, he is still innocent until proven guilty.
I have no problem imagining a scenario in which the government pins a horrible crime on an innocent person in order to advance a political agenda (in this case, gun control).
The UN is about to impose international gun control provisions on the world, and Obama and Hillary support it. They will use this massacre to their advantage.
For the record, I don’t believe that the government had anything to do with the Aurora shooting. It seems clear that James Holmes is mentally ill and acted alone.
But his 6th Amendment rights are to be honored and respected.
Whom else do they have as a suspect?
Yeom Pyo Lee?
Whom else do they have as a suspect?
Yoem Pyo Lee?
News outlets always use this term. If they don't, sleazy defense attorneys will claim that their client has been tried and convicted by the media and can't get a fair trial.
That's all. Nothing to get excited about.