Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney haters, did you cry to your parents when u lost growing up
Threads | 7/14/2012 | Self

Posted on 07/14/2012 9:24:58 PM PDT by shoedog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 421-424 next last
To: raccoonnookkeeper
It looks like Mitt is planning on following the classic GOP strategy of pouring on the power in the last couple of months. I wish he WOULD tell Obama off about these whoppers that Obama is telling about him, rather than letting the shoes drop of their own accord (typically they get frowned on by fact checker organizations) in their own sweet time. But maybe his advisors suggest that against Obama this would be counterproductive and simply encourage Obama to raise more distractions. I don’t know. It’s too soon to say. One thing we can be pretty darn sure of is that Obama will never, ever accuse Mitt of being too liberal.

Well Mitt and his advisers are no strangers in massaging and manipulating facts. So we shall see IF their superior sophistication can withstand the JonStewart medias rampant distortions.

181 posted on 07/15/2012 12:08:32 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: raccoonnookkeeper

Please post that list of Romney’s greatest conservative accomplishments. Use as many brushes as you please.


182 posted on 07/15/2012 12:09:24 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

A more conservative congress might succeed in halting the 60 mph wagon when the other one would shoot right on by.


183 posted on 07/15/2012 12:09:37 AM PDT by raccoonnookkeeper (I keep raccoons in a nook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I am not going to keep dragging this out.

But keep in mind that once Obama gets a 2nd term, the gloves come off, because he is no longer politically accountable.

And he has already decided to rule by imperial fiat when it comes to gays in the military, defense of marriage act, amnesty for illegals, forcing the Catholic Church to pay for abortions, Fast and Furious, gutting the 1996 welfare reform act unilaterally, and you get the picture.

If you want more of the same and can live with the consequences, good for you.

You are truly a better man than I.


184 posted on 07/15/2012 12:10:24 AM PDT by radpolis (Liberals: You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: shoedog

Project much?


185 posted on 07/15/2012 12:11:29 AM PDT by bramps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

The democrats went on and on about Obama being their only hope. Please sing a different tune. That one’s wore out.


186 posted on 07/15/2012 12:12:30 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

With the greatest of respect, sir, I say that this miscasts the issue at hand. The issue at hand is that Mitt stinks less than Barack on virtually any point, and the difference is large enough that the rest of the body politic could (and probably will) at least keep status quo, long enough for more conservative forces to regroup. To put it differently, Mitt could be influenced. Barack will never be.


187 posted on 07/15/2012 12:13:03 AM PDT by raccoonnookkeeper (I keep raccoons in a nook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
It's really simple. If you vote for a third party nutcase, or if you stay home, you might as well have voted to reelect Obama.

Bull puckey. Mathematically and materially -- horse crap one hundred percent.

Been keeping up with current events, cyn? Obama is in big trouble with his supporters. He is loathed. Lots of folks who voted for him last time are dumping him this time.

There's only one way you can vote for Obama, and that is to mark his name on your ballot. PERIOD. It's really simple.

There's only one way you can vote for Romney, and that is to mark his name on your ballot. PERIOD. It's really simple.

There's only ONE WAY you can vote for government tyranny. Not so simple -- both the Democrat and Republican parties have candidates that guarantee that no matter which party you choose between the two, you'll be voting for government tyranny.

Unless there's a miracle (and they do happen!), our next president is guaranteed to be an advocate of government tyranny -- HAVE YOU LOOKED AT ROMNEY'S RECORD? I have.

In 2012 at the top of the ticket, I'll be voting the only sensible way I can: third party, to do my part in weakening the popular mandate of whichever government tyrant wins.

Incidentally, it will be the first time in 36 years of voting that this conservative will have ever declined a Republican on any ballot, ever -- and I've voted for some lulus, including Arnold Schwarzenegger. Romney is over the line; voting for him is as nuts as voting for Obama.

188 posted on 07/15/2012 12:13:09 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

If you believe that there are no differences between the two parties than you are simply mistaken.

The Republicans could certainly be more conservative, but the Democrats could hardly be more leftist. They are full blown socialist and the head of their party is as close to a Stalinist as we have ever had in the office of President.

So please, spare us the ‘both parties are the same’ mantra.


189 posted on 07/15/2012 12:14:06 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: shoedog

I was a Prosecutor in the Commonwealth of VA for 25 years. I have argued before SCOTUS and a myriad of other State and Federal Courts. I was on Law Review at UVA and have other degrees and awards. Save your infantile attack on we “Romney haters”. Romney is a feckless liar. He can not be trusted. He is as inept a candidate as we could possible manufacture. He is a stooge for the GOP elite. I have more but I am tired and my response is, quite frankly, all your post deserves. Am I a Romney hater? You betcha. Will I vote for this fox into the conservative hen house? Not a chance. He couldn’t pay me to vote for him.

Santorum 2012


190 posted on 07/15/2012 12:14:53 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Earlier in the year, I would have said a Ron Paul third party run might have been the one chance to avoid two routes to disaster. However, I think Romney can be forced into the straight and narrow path required, which is what should have happened in the second Bush term. There are probably no second chances beyond 2012. Romney is clearly not an evil man and not a stupid one either. He is more or less in the camp of the “good guys” despite some liberal tendencies and some disturbing lack of consistency.

I think if the choice is Obama or Romney, it reduces to disaster or uncertainty. I would take uncertainty over disaster any time.

But keep at the forefront the principle that America is yours by inheritance. Romney must understand that if he is to govern, it is for you and not for any background group or interest. It is not for any watered down globalist agenda, nor the Mormon church, nor big (huge) business.

A president who gets the first two amendments and a balanced budget would be perfect for these times. In as friendly a way as possible, remind Mitt Romney and his strongest supporters of these basic facts every day, now to November and beyond.

And seek every opportunity to drive Obama out, he is poison and will enable every anti-American interest group at home and abroad without caution in an unchecked second term.

God bless America !!!


191 posted on 07/15/2012 12:15:51 AM PDT by Peter ODonnell (E pluribus biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: raccoonnookkeeper

Listen to “The Great One” on Romney if you dare:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvASl8yIBVU


192 posted on 07/15/2012 12:15:51 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

The US House and Senate are my entire focus, right along with state and local races.

I don’t give a rip about Romney’s VP.

In fact, I remain in serious prayer for a miracle in Tampa.


193 posted on 07/15/2012 12:16:09 AM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY- IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Keep praying for that miracle in Tampa!

I know I’m not the only one praying.


194 posted on 07/15/2012 12:20:29 AM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY- IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Democrats found that it was more difficult than they expected to open doors further once they got their wedge Obama in. America was not ready for the degree of leftist overhaul that Democrats dreamed about.

With the utmost respect, I submit to you that to ask whether Romney is a savior miscasts the most vital question. The question is whether Romney if allowed in will likely be useful in shifting the battle. The time for microscopically scrupulous scrutiny of personalities was during the lead up to primaries. Even Sarah Palin was being doubted because she was allegedly too easy on Bristol in her affair with Levi. Now that all the microscopes have been dropped, we are all wishing we could have had any of Palin, Cain, Perry, Santorum, Gingrich (among others)... maybe even Paul! But it didn’t come to pass. If the most serious soul searching needs to be done, it is why THAT failed.


195 posted on 07/15/2012 12:22:14 AM PDT by raccoonnookkeeper (I keep raccoons in a nook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Fair enough; what does “The Great One” have to say about Barack?


196 posted on 07/15/2012 12:23:02 AM PDT by raccoonnookkeeper (I keep raccoons in a nook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
He was not only their only hope. HE DELIVERRED. He gave them a big bail out, he gave them massive intrusion in business with his regulatory agencies, he gave them the holy grail, government control of every ones health care. The longer he stays in the more he gives to his Leftist base.

He not only was their only hope, HE WON EVERY FIGHT FOR THEM. He is a very successful Leftist. Maybe as successful as FDR or LBJ. Maybe even more so.

Those two people have given us fits for decades and win or lose, Obama will as well. Getting rid of Obama helps to slow the bleeding.

This isn't an election it is a call for a retraining order. It is a cease and desist order. It has to be looked upon as an eviction.

197 posted on 07/15/2012 12:24:03 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Finny
You keep spittling this same deception. I'm almost convinced now that you might even believe it! It is so convoluted in its wrongness that it has the hallmarks of brilliant deception, deception like the father of lies weaves for the gullible.

Let's see if we can dismantle some of this deception. First, let's look at the nature of voters in America. The average voter who might even be reading your deception at FR is not likely to know the names of conservatives down ticket, because they have been effectively programed to vote by party designation, if they can figure it out when they get tot he voting booth.

These people when urged to vote a third party to prevent Rombama from getting a landslide, or mandate-looking count, are not liekly to differentiate as precisely as you imply they will. Their voting pattern this time will be so chaotic as to be easily spun.

Second, you contradict your own premise. And you need not toss your usual crap that I have not discerned your premise. I'm at least as smart as you. In garbling the vote patterns where a state will be going blue anyway or red anyway, you present the perfect storm for cheating the down ticket counts which will aid and abet the dnc professional cheaters and vote manufacturers and vote counters (there is a significant portion of votes which will be counted by a Soros owned SPANISH company)! And you want to hand them a chaotic deviation from the norms of past voting patterns to use for their manufacturing wins for 'just enough' democrat criminal enterprise members so that they retain the Senate and gain or take over the House while keeping the criminal enterprise Obama thugocracy in power and picking the next two or three members to the SCOTUS?

Yeah, I am convinced you know what your 'strategery' will do in aiding the democrats to punish the GOPe and the entire world, to feed your ego-deviant personal needs. You are trying to present a process which is taylor made to assist the dnc fraud needed to keep the criminal enterprise party in control over America. You are the enemy, not the brilliant strategist you're trying to portray.

And the third point I would make is your ridiculing the danger that the lying, degenerate, fascist and his czars and regulators are revealed to be. Obama not a king ... yeah, that's real adult spittling. He's not only not a king, he's not even an America lover or a believer in the Constitution. He's the most dangerous enemy America has ever faced, and you're doing your best to take that out of focus, blur the reality, and aid the fraud and deception you and I and most at FR know is coming. And we don't even know that free elections will actually happen in November, so ridiculing the dangerous nature of the sonofabitch int he White House tells me you're not what you want us to believe you are. I'm getting a strong odor of obamanoid with your incessant mantra trying to grease the skids for cheating the vote counts.

Is Milt a conservative? Not just no but hell no! But he is not the obama regime and he doesn't hate the Constitution and he doesn't carry a grudge against white and Hispanic/Latino people, and he loves this country and its History. ... And I don't think I like you, either, so you just watch yer self, beelzebubba.

198 posted on 07/15/2012 12:25:44 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I don’t envision him running the same cut throat, take no prisoners campaign against The Marxist like he ran against his TEA Party conservative rivals, do you?
***That’s because Romnuts has more respect for his fellow libruls than for conservatives.


199 posted on 07/15/2012 12:28:05 AM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: raccoonnookkeeper

Same thing I do. Obama is a usurping, treasonous tyrant who should be impeached.


200 posted on 07/15/2012 12:28:59 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 421-424 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson