>> Rush, you say “never compromise your morality”, which voting for Romney would do
In my calculation, fewer nascent lives will suffer from abortion with Republicans in 3 Houses notwithstanding the fact that Romney has indeed betrayed Life. My vote wouldn’t necessarily be for Romney, it would be for Life. A 2nd term for Obama would keep the Life threat elevated.
The risk is well distributed on the few options we have. Romney could certainly pull the Republican party Left, but the GOP could also lose both Houses in 2014 with an Obama 2nd term; Leftwing Media and Obama would own the national dialog denigrating the “uncooperative” House Republicans in a two-year campaign. An Obama victory would continue in a campaign momentum to rid DC of Congressional GOP control.
Despite our diverging expectations, there’s no indifference to Life.
“An Obama victory would continue in a campaign momentum to rid DC of Congressional GOP control.”
Obama’s abuse of office has already energized me to agressively look for a vote for and provide monetary support for the best conservatives for House and Senate. He did it in 2010...it will happen again this fall and in 2014. I don’t think it out of the realm of possibility that he could be impeached and found guilty in Senate IF we get the House and Senate stacked with conservatives. We MUST get separation of powers back in place.
Romney, being a “Republican”, will get away with “murder” (literally) and the GOP will NOT stand up to him. His presence in the POTUS chair ensures that conservatism will disappear. Romney being in office will cost us control of House and Senate in 2014....and Romney will move to the left not the right. He would be a disaster for conservative control of the country. He did a terrible job as Governor....what would lead one to think he would do any better as POTUS.
I’m voting third party for POTUS, to ensure that whoever wins (Obama or Romney) does NOT have a large enough vote to claim a mandate. Another Freeper reasoned that one out, and I’m following that lead.