It is way way too late for this statement! This “expert” inflamed the atmosphere with his “expert testimony” of his near certainty that the voice on the call was that of Trayvon Martin. All the objections regarding other witnesses’ statements, (TM’s father’s first statement that the voice was not his son’s, for example), were well known and publicized as part of the coverage of his statements. He had ample time to correct or retract his inflammatory statements, but chose to bask in the warm glow of the media and the mob. If only as a precautionary lesson to others, he needs to be sued not only by Zimmerman, but by anyone else, perhaps as a class, who was harmed.
In his blog, he also invites readers to in a sense “vote” on whether the voice is TM’s or GZ’s. Is this how expert witnesses act nowadays?
This expert, if such he be, is saying that his first opinion was tentative and not intended for public consumption.What’s the name of the cop who originally wanted to charge Zimmerman but was initially overruled? The one who “volunteered” for reassignment to the midnight shift after he was tagged as the hostile leaker of police investigation information to reporters?
This guy should never again be able to work as an “expert” witness. How many real criminals will now have their cases overturned by this phony.