But Corsi is an Arpaio Posse insider under embargo not to reveal what has been found. I regard this article to be likely to be a preview of the presser coming just one week before the event.
The “high production quality” Youtube ready video of the evidence has likely been prepared. Corsi knows how to run a marketing campaign and I regard this as Corsi’s attempt at framing in advance trying to spin a Posse finding that flagrant Communist Frank Marshall Davis was the dad as being something that was consistent with INS suspicions.
In other words, Corsi is trying to validate the Posse finding using the INS docs.
Was Davis really a commie or was he a plant by the Intelligence Community (FBI or other alphabet-soup agency) to monitor the Chicago underground Red scene? Of some note is the fact Davis’ legitimate son now has an intelligence job at the DEA. My experience is that spookery runs in the family and is often a privilege of family connections. Hence, the IC would go to great lengths to mask Davis’ involvement in this mess. Likewise Obama Jr has to be regarded as a creation of the IC; the perfectly manufactured yes-man with impeccable (that is, unknowable) credentials. Frankly, I have little confidence that Corsi or WND will pursue this obvious line of questioning and suspect they are just another layer of the coverup. Arpaio? One can only hope.
If you ask me, the INS seemed to question Obama’s paternity in his stepfather’s records. They asked someone to check the status of the kid in relation to Lolo Soetoro, with regard to a specific law. This was when Lolo was trying to either stay in or return to the US (I forget which). Since it was known that Lolo and Ann were married, then why would there be any question about his status? The answer given was that, within the definitions in that law, Obama was Lolo’s stepson. So either they questioned whether he possibly was the biological father (technically, not legally) or they questioned whether he’d adopted him and so was his legal father. Otherwise, I see no reason why they pursued an answer to that specific question. The answer seems to have been that technically, Lolo was his stepfather. The question seemed to have something to do with whether or not being separated from Lolo would be a hardship on the child.
If you ask me, the INS seemed to question Obama’s paternity in his stepfather’s records. They asked someone to check the status of the kid in relation to Lolo Soetoro, with regard to a specific law. This was when Lolo was trying to either stay in or return to the US (I forget which). Since it was known that Lolo and Ann were married, then why would there be any question about his status? The answer given was that, within the definitions in that law, Obama was Lolo’s stepson. So either they questioned whether he possibly was the biological father (technically, not legally) or they questioned whether he’d adopted him and so was his legal father. Otherwise, I see no reason why they pursued an answer to that specific question. The answer seems to have been that technically, Lolo was his stepfather. The question seemed to have something to do with whether or not being separated from Lolo would be a hardship on the child.