[David]

That’s probably what the U of WA transcript also is. An ABSTRACT. ANNA OBAMA, whoever she might have been, enrolled at the U of WA in time to attend classes in September 1961. But to do so, she would have had to register BEFORE the date of birth the BIRTH CERTIFICATE ABSTRACT CLAIMS to be the birthdate of zero.

And she’s shown starting classes on September 19, when the U of WA calendar clearly shows courses in 1961 commenced September 25.

With all due respect, I don't think that is an abstract. That form wasn't in use until ten or fifteen years later--they didn't have it; it isn't what they used in the 1960's. That transcript is just a fake--prepared by someone who had access to later transcripts from the 80's to use as a form. It is fake.

[Fred Nerks]

...That transcript is just a fake--prepared by someone who had access to later transcripts from the 80's to use as a form. It is fake.

I was trying to think of an alternative regarding the method...of course it's fake, it's as fake as the recent birth certificate, but that's an 'abstract' (AS THE WORD APPEARS STAMPED ON THE BACK OF THE BC) in the sense that what we see is a BC form relative to the period as a background, and picked up information from a number of existing sources (such as a bc for the original BHO2 born within the date range of the public index 1960-1965) on which the father's RACE may have been shown as NEGRO-AFRICAN for example, and 'they' simply dropped the NEGRO. I say that because one of the layers exposed on the recent fake shows the name of the mother as ANN D.....and another layer shows UNHAM added to create DUNHAM. So ABSTRACT in the context in which I used the word means FAKE, just like the birth certificate.