Posted on 07/10/2012 12:27:49 PM PDT by Kaslin
Some of you people are amazing.
Obama 2nd term = 100% chance of collapse and communism
Romney 1st term = 50-75% he is a disaster.
Vote for the 25% he does the right thing. Its not a matter of anything but facing R E A L I T Y.
An Obama 2nd term just because some peoples’ little pony and unicorn was not on the ticket in the first place is insane.
"We"? Speak for yourself. I've never supported the grinning liberal fraud.
Wait - haven’t most of those saviors you listed said voting for that idiot Mitt, and not some pretend candidate, is a good idea? Then they must suck too. If only everyone were as wonderful as the FR-e
It's a self-fulfilling prophecy, because you and others believe it.
Until you find it within yourself to stand up and disagree with the course of events, they'll continue to steam roller on. And over us.
I do not in any way, shape or form support Ron Paul. I do not support Obama, either.
I want Obama out of the White House! Republicans have an opportunity to wipe-out Democrats, and the GOPe backs...a socialist like Romney! What the Hell?
Political conventions are just that - political. No one delegate is required BY LAW to vote for Romney. There are rules but Romney himself has conspired with GOPe in many states and cheated.
ABO will not win this election for the Republicans. The socialist Romney will not win this election BECAUSE he isn’t offering any reason to vote FOR him over socialist Obama!
We can only win this election with a candidate who can state clearly what he will do to pull us out of the mess created by Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama. Romney isn’t going to do that because he has no core conservative values.
Delegates to Tampa this August aren’t stupid. They’re aware of this problem. Romney can threaten all he wants - there is no enthusiasm for his candidacy and ‘whipping’ the delegates will only result in revolt.
The convention this August in Tampa will be a free-for-all. It will be a political party looking for a real candidate.
If you’re enthused by Romney, fine: all I hope you would consider is an alternative to the road to serfdom.
I don’t look at any of these people as saviors.
I have one focus in 2012 and one only - GETTING RID OF OBAMA
P E R I O D
This nation will not survive a second term of this disaster.
I am going ask the question that Mark Levin asked last week, who would be the candidate to replace Romney at the convention.
Palin has said she is not interested. I keep hearing replace, but with no realistic alternative.
I don't care how much you may hate Romney, or who you wanted to see get the nomination. But you and anyone else who thinks "anything can happen at the convention" are so clueless as to not even be part of this conversation. You may as well have posted a picture of a rabbit with a pancake on its head.
Que the circular firing squad
He didn’t “earn” delegates, Kaslin.
In many cases, there was no alternative to Romney because the state GOP folks screwed over the other candidates. Voter turnout was very, very low.
Romney will not win against Obama. Both are socialists, and the majority of Americans don’t want socialism!
This is the message that I've been pounding for months now.
Personal honor and integrity are just that. Personal. No one has the power to take them away from you. Only you have the power to relinquish them. If you can be persuaded to cross that line into darkness, you are forever degraded by a choice which you made yourself.
If I am to die, I certainly won't do it by going out with a whimper and a boot lick. I would rather be crushed to death with my personal honor and integrity intact, while spitting in the tyrant's face, thank you.
Bingo.
The worst is that ABO is risking a landslide for Romney -- even Rush talks about how weak and vulnerable and desperate Obama is. So instead of taking advantage of that, wherein on a split vote plurality, Obama could very conceivably get in office with a large majority of the popular vote cast against him and LACKING in spades any kind of mandate, and of having confidence in our Republican Congress to steamroll that kind of humiliated, despised president ...
... ABO seriously dangerously risks getting Romney in on a landslide. We'd all know it was a referendum on Obama ... and while it's all about Obama now, by the end of 2013, and 2014, it would be all about Romney. He and the GOP-e and moderate Republicans and Democrats would point to his landslide as a popular mandate FOR Romney's "progressive style of governing." And the numbers would back them up. And Rush could pontificate until he was blue in the face and it wouldn't phase Romney or Moderates in the slightest.
I'm voting to prevent Romney from getting that landslide, and I'm banking on a pretty good bet that enough Democrats are going to defect from Obama to give him no more than a weak plurality. Either way, the candidate will lack any numbers to back up claims of having a "mandate." With Romney, we had all BETTER pray that if he wins, it's only on a weak plurality where he is denied any grounds for claiming a mandate.
There is no voting "against" Obama, there is only voting FOR government tyranny under "Republican" to replace him. I refuse to vote for that. I will be praying for a plurality and voting for it, too.
Funny how in this supposed "circular firing squad," everybody's aiming at the same guy.
Impeachment of 0bama? That’s your strategy? No, wait...how about an asteroid striking Washington DC and destroying all the liberals at once? It’s probably more realistic, coz if 0bama wins, he’s probably keeping the Senate, and given the way the pendulum swings, he’ll have the House in 2014. At the very least, the last time I read the Constitution it takes two-thirds of “members present” to convict on Articles of Impeachment. That’s 67 senators, meaning you need fewer than 34 democrat senators. Not one of them will break ranks to vote impeachment. The democrats will never have less than 34 Senate seats.
But hey, if you want to live your fantasy of 0bama being impeached, go ahead. It’s your right.
Of everyone who ran - none were the best we have.
Santorum, Newt, Cain, Perry, Bachmann Paul, all had their own issues. not a single one of them was the best and guess what?
Each of them would have a hard time vs Obama as well, but also lack the fundraising abilities.
It is what it is. The issue is getting rid of the Communist Destroyer and then fight Mittens at all junctures.
Dude. Get over it. We lost the primaries. The moderate/liberals won. They got more votes for their man. Romney is the party's nominee. You can choose to vote for that nominee in the general election or not.
No, I'm not on board with your non-plans for convention upheaval to overturn the will of the voters. Neither are you.
You are not going to the convention. You are not going to raise up some hell and get the nomination changed.
You are going to watch Romney accept the nomination on television. Or you are going to turn off the television. That's it.
You are not a revolutionary. You just play one on the internet.
If you think that Baraq and the Chicago mob will somehow be restrained in their attitude and behavior because they won with a plurality, you’re just wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.