Yes. This NH law is nothing more than a proclamation. The jury can always vote its conscience. To think otherwise ignores the basic fact that no judge can order a juror to deliver a verdict of guilty or innocence. This is common sense, and the only thing keeping the Republic from once again enjoying basic freedom is KNOWLEDGE of the people. OMG.
Imagine what would happen if jurors discovered that they can call and question witnesses or determine what is and isn’t admissible evidence for themselves.
The whole legal landscape would shift.