Since when is a Supreme Court Justice allowed to make “promises” on future cases? If Roberts made a “promise” on a case before it was argued in his court, then he should be impeached.
impeach shoeless john roberts?
Roberts upheld the law and made some comments about the commerce clause. Since he upheld the law on the basis of something other than commerce, no matter how much he rails against the commerce application of mandates, all he has done is offer reasoning.
He has established no future path on commerce mandates that must be followed.
Roberts is too cute by half, and everyone trying to salvage something substantive out of his narcissistic theory is simply enabling a guy who is over-the-top in love with himself.
The bottom line is that Roberts upheld and strengthened massive government and massive government’s intrusion into our lives.