The dissent is unsigned because Roberts wrote it - it was originally to be his majority opinion. When he switched sides, the conservatives left most of it in place and didn’t sign their names to it to give a clue that it was originally his opinion.
Is that speculation or is that something that is known? If known, how is it known?
“The dissent is unsigned because Roberts wrote it - it was originally to be his majority opinion. When he switched sides, the conservatives left most of it in place and didnt sign their names to it to give a clue that it was originally his opinion.”
Bada bing* Exactly
“The dissent is unsigned because Roberts wrote it - it was originally to be his majority opinion. When he switched sides, the conservatives left most of it in place and didnt sign their names to it to give a clue that it was originally his opinion.”
Bada bing* Exactly
SO, he wrote both opinions.
“The dissent is unsigned because Roberts wrote it - it was originally to be his majority opinion. When he switched sides, the conservatives left most of it in place and didnt sign their names to it to give a clue that it was originally his opinion.”
Bada bing* Exactly
“The dissent is unsigned because Roberts wrote it - it was originally to be his majority opinion. When he switched sides, the conservatives left most of it in place and didnt sign their names to it to give a clue that it was originally his opinion.”
Bada bing* Exactly
“The dissent is unsigned because Roberts wrote it - it was originally to be his majority opinion. When he switched sides, the conservatives left most of it in place and didnt sign their names to it to give a clue that it was originally his opinion.”
You nailed it
“The dissent is unsigned because Roberts wrote it - it was originally to be his majority opinion. When he switched sides, the conservatives left most of it in place and didnt sign their names to it to give a clue that it was originally his opinion.”
You nailed it