Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Prior thread on Newsbusters article about reporter Jan Crawford on Face the Nation this morning.
1 posted on 07/01/2012 12:16:51 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: kristinn

He was threatened.


2 posted on 07/01/2012 12:18:57 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Some people just hate Americans and America although they can’t explain why.


3 posted on 07/01/2012 12:20:32 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my Constitution?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Traitor. Pure. And. Simple.


4 posted on 07/01/2012 12:21:27 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Obama, the coverup king, has had his evil regime dig up some dirt on Roberts. They may have a photo of him french kissing a poodle.


5 posted on 07/01/2012 12:21:31 PM PDT by IbJensen (If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Early-onset Alzheimer’s?


6 posted on 07/01/2012 12:22:15 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

ObamaTAX, compliments of CJ Roberts.


10 posted on 07/01/2012 12:26:46 PM PDT by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efHCdKb5UWc#t=55s


11 posted on 07/01/2012 12:30:33 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Where am I wrong here :

the Affordable Care Act has 300+ pages detailing how the US goverment will control and regulate the industry as well as force participation of the citizens in the federal governments regulation of what is a wide range of PUBLIC entities.

The governement regulation and control of public entities IN THIS MANNER is not authorized under the general welfare clause or the interstate commerce clause and certainly does not fit the enumerated powers.

I blame the five "justices" who did not do their job of interpreting constitutionality, but instead twisted a morsel of fabricated fact (that it is a tax contrary to what the content of the bill details) in order to justify their personal paradigm of socialism.

Even if it is in fact a tax is not their business, taxation is certainly at the discretion of congress. the issue in question was this ; does congress have the authority to regulate public entities and force the people to fund their imposition ?

it is exactly the same as if they passed "the Affordable Car Act", forcing a tax in order to make you buy a car, with 300 pages detailing how they will control each car company and how they will decide what car you will have , the fact that it is funded by a tax does NOT address the constitutionality of the act but is merly a deflection and dereliction of the duties of a cheif justice

?

13 posted on 07/01/2012 12:31:02 PM PDT by KTM rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

14 posted on 07/01/2012 12:31:08 PM PDT by Lockbar (March toward the sound of the guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

15 posted on 07/01/2012 12:31:17 PM PDT by Lockbar (March toward the sound of the guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Time for Impeachment


16 posted on 07/01/2012 12:31:27 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

The reporter on the Fox News panel from the Washington Post says “Roberts plays chess while everybody else plays checkers.” He notes that Roberts got 2 of the liberals to go along with him against Medicaid expansion and is reaping what amounts to “strange new respect” from the left as a “reasonable guy.” He claims that sets him up to be able to return to the conservative side in upcoming votes next year on affirmative action and some provisions of the voting rights act. Plus , it appears to me the left recognizes he really handed them a hot potato with the “taxation with misrepresentation” decision. Chrissy Mathews panel of experts voted 8-4 that Romney would be wise to downplay Obamacare , so that tells you Romney should do the opposite. So even if unintentional, Roberts is going to help the Republicans re-take the Senate and the White House.


19 posted on 07/01/2012 12:35:37 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

This is one of the most alarming things to happen in a long damned time. And I know every DAY there’s another assault on our liberty but this is really beyond anything.

...When Obama heard the ORIGINAL mis-reporting on CNN that it was overturned- he was “puzzled and surprised”....

...Roberts was red-eyed and upset while reading the ruling...

Seriously- what the HELL went on here?


26 posted on 07/01/2012 12:46:46 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

WOW.....this dude’s “legacy” is over, IMO. THe Supreme Court doesn’t leak like this normally. If his eyes were red and he seemed unhappy when he read his opinion on Thursday morning, it was likely because he knew the other conservative justices were done with him.


28 posted on 07/01/2012 12:47:25 PM PDT by Girlene (Chief AHat Roberts - should resign in disgrace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

So Justice Kennedy was the one trying to get Roberts to see straight? Where were Alito, Scalia and Thomas?


30 posted on 07/01/2012 12:53:18 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...


It is not known why Roberts changed his view on the mandate and decided to uphold the law. At least one conservative justice tried to get him to explain it, but was unsatisfied with the response, according to a source with knowledge of the conversation.

NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN
34 posted on 07/01/2012 12:57:56 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

“It is not known why Roberts changed his view on the mandate and decided to uphold the law”

He found a horses head in his bed.


36 posted on 07/01/2012 1:02:28 PM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
“Regardless of his thinking, it was clear to the conservatives that Roberts wanted the Court out of the red-hot dispute. “

I guess we know where he would stand on eligibility.

37 posted on 07/01/2012 1:05:07 PM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2901219/posts?page=76#76


38 posted on 07/01/2012 1:06:54 PM PDT by mkjessup (Finley Peter Dunne- "Politics ain't beanbag")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Another lawsuit needs to be brought before the Supreme Court: Can the federal government tax a citizen for inactivity while giving waivers to others for the same inactivity?


40 posted on 07/01/2012 1:09:14 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson