Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tau Food
GOP leaders felt free to nominate Romney

We had a primary. It was hard-fought.

There was every opportunity to put up a non-Romney. FR had its favorites at various times...and they came and went.

Primary process is over. Time to vote ABO.

37 posted on 06/30/2012 10:59:44 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: what's up
Time to vote ABO.

I'll join you in voting against Obama, but I'm not going to help you replace him with a liberal you like better. I'm voting against both liberals.

Win or lose, I'm voting for Tom Hoefling this year.

45 posted on 06/30/2012 11:10:28 AM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: what's up; gzzimlich
Primary process is over. Time to vote ABO.

On the contrary, FRiend, time to ponder the warning gzzimlich posted way back in April:

I live in a country (the UK) where the “conservative” choice supports gay marriage, socialised healthcare and the “right” of unions to make domestic labour almost prohibitively costly to employers.

I emphasize that this is the “conservative” candidate (David Cameron.)

Romney might seem like a decent option when compared with Obama, but my country - a surveillance state in which the use of “reasonable force” in defending your life and property was only made official policy a couple of years ago - is a prime example of what happens when you compromise your principles and start rationalising voting for the lesser of two evils.

I'm voting for a plurality. I'm voting third party and pray that everybody who's disgusted with both Obama and Romney do the same so whichever evil gets the White House, is facing four years of it being ON RECORD that the large majority of American voters wanted him to get lost. It's the only advantage my presidential vote can give to conservative Repblicans in Congress. Obama is loathed though the MSM spins otherwise; if he wins on a plurality where nearly two in three voted against him, he would be humiliated and a mockery. Republicans chastened by how Romney was rejected, would move right. Obama would be a scarecrow trying to advance his agenda.

Time to stop hyperventilating "ABO!" and START THINKING.

373 posted on 07/01/2012 6:56:25 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: what's up
Time to vote ABO.

If ABO stands for anybody but Obama, why are you not satisfied unless the person votes for Romney?

You should really just change the label to RNO, which can mean two things:

Romney not Obama, and;

Republican - Name Only!

Both are accurate.

404 posted on 07/02/2012 3:20:58 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson