But one of the fundamental precepts in the American experiment has been drastically altered.
Government may now compel commerce.
At this point, all that's left is the initiation of the purges of the people who don't 'think right'.
I just posted this article, putting link for discussion. Makes sense to me (sort of), hope the writer is correct.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2900788/posts
Actually, Justice Roberts Demolished Obama In His Supreme Court Ruling
Business Insider ^ | Jun. 28, 2012, | Grace Wyler
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:09:26 PM by little jeremiah
....But while Roberts may have saved Obama’s signature domestic legislation — and perhaps his reelection campaign — by siding with the court’s liberal wing, he actually did it in spite of Obama, not because of him.
Roberts’ opened his opinion today by declaring, unequivocally, that the individual mandate — which requires people to buy insurance or pay a penalty — is not constitutional under the Commerce Clause or the Necessary and Proper Clause. It’s a direct shot at the Obama administration’s defense of the law’s constitutionality, which largely relied on those two clauses, which give Congress the power to regulate commerce and to enact provisions that are necessary to carry out its laws, respectively.
snip
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
But one of the fundamental precepts in the American experiment has been drastically altered.
Government may now compel commerce.
At this point, all that's left is the initiation of the purges of the people who don't 'think right'.