[reegs]

How does this prevent a freedom-loving “insurance” company from providing health insurance for $.01 a month with an extensive rider that indicates no actual healthcare (with maybe the exception of aspirin) will be provided?

[JediJones]

How does this prevent a freedom-loving “insurance” company from providing health insurance for $.01 a month with an extensive rider that indicates no actual healthcare (with maybe the exception of aspirin) will be provided?

Because I'm pretty sure puts all kinds of restrictions on what insurance companies can do. It sounds like they essentially become agencies of the government based on how many rules they have to follow to be allowed to operate as insurance companies.