Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Are we already in or are we headed for a deflationary depression?
1 posted on 06/26/2012 4:24:23 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam

It’s extremely bad out there with oil prices crashing and other commondies following suit. The oil industry will be devestated and we have no idea how far the price of oil will drop.


2 posted on 06/26/2012 4:29:18 PM PDT by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

It is darkest before dawn, when all of the Chicken Littles are convinced that the end is near. Then the Sun rises.

Private Investment is up 10%.
Web 3.0 is revolutionizing the online world.
Fracking is increasing U.S. oil and natural gas production that is driving down gasoline and electricity costs.

In other words, the Recovery has begun with investment and major tech revolutions.


3 posted on 06/26/2012 4:35:58 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

no


4 posted on 06/26/2012 4:35:58 PM PDT by palmer (Jim, please bill me 50 cents for this completely useless post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

All those toxic and non-performing real estate loans out there, which have still not been foreclosed or written down, continue to deflate much of the wealth, because their presence continues to depress overall real estate values. Once these toxic mortgages are drained out of the system, the real price of real estate may then be re-established, and we shall have a “new normal”. This allows a slower but more orderly growth of new construction, or rehabilitation of existing housing, both major drivers of any employment recovery, leading back to a healthier overall employment picture. But first, enormous numbers of restrictive government actions will also have to be reversed, both as regulations and as taxation, and imposed mandates that have no rational basis in fact. In fact, there are a LOT of toxic factors that are paralyzing recovery right now, much like what fed the Great Depression from 1933 through the Second World War. The New Deal kept trying to “fix” things, and only made the mess worse and more tangled, until the demands of wartime mobilization made much of the regulations either dead letter, or modified so much as to remove most of their former restrictiveness. After the war was over, a lot (though by no means all) of the New Deal was repealed, often over the objection of then-President Harry Truman. The effects of that boom were felt through most of the Eisenhower years (which had a couple of slowdowns of its own, but only for a year or two at a time).

In retrospect, that was kind of a “Golden Age”, though not recognized at the time.

Then we got Kennedy-Johnson and the “Great Society” the effects of which STILL drag on the economy, through a vast expansion of the welfare state. For example, the “War on Poverty” contributed almost the entire cost of our national debt (yes, the $16 trillion or so), essentially, we have done it all on borrowed money, and what do we have to show for it. The money is still borrowed, and hanging over our heads like the Sword of Damocles.


7 posted on 06/26/2012 5:07:29 PM PDT by alloysteel (Fear and intimidation work. At least on the short term.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

The writer of this piece surely doesn’t go to the grocery store, buy auto and health insurance and most definitely isn’t putting any children thru university.


8 posted on 06/26/2012 5:09:03 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Deflation is the death knell of debt issuers. Who is the largest debt issuer in the world? Your friends at the US treasury. Deflation implies a more valuable dollar, which means you pay back what you owe with more expensive money.

If there is one thing you can count on, it is that they will do ANYTHING to inflate/devalue the currency.

What we really have is a form of late 1970s stagflation. Prices of what you need (oil, food) are on the rise (although WTI is now under $80) while prices for your biggest asset (your house typically) is shrinking and looks to do so for a while. Add that it looks like taxes will go up and the middle class is getting squeezed big time.

schu

9 posted on 06/26/2012 5:21:47 PM PDT by schu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
as banks feared creating more toxic assets that would come back to haunt them.

That is only half the story -- the demand for loans was minimal, because business was contracting because of the lack of consumer demand for their products.

11 posted on 06/26/2012 5:38:29 PM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I’d rather see runaway deflation than runaway inflation. In deflation, there is a bottom. In inflation, there’s always more inflation. Plus, if you are a saver, deflation makes your savings worth more.


16 posted on 06/26/2012 6:46:28 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Our economy won't heal until one particular black man is unemployed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Liberal/Keynesian "economists" have a deathly fear of deflation because they are zero sum thinkers. They believe no wealth can be created. It can all only be divvied up and "distributed." There can be no expansion without inflation because expansion IS inflation. Conversely, deflation IS collapse. We actually went through a mild deflation from Reagan's economic correction until the end of the century. There was labor peace, few major strikes. There was little clamor for higher wages even though the nominal wage rate was not increasing all that much. But as time passed things just got easier even if one's paycheck didn't see much change. People felt less and less squeezed. Prices of things people bought were coming down as productivity went up, slowly but steadily. Wealth was being created. It was truly good times. We had a recession in the 90s that folks knew about because they read about it in the paper. It all came to an end early in the Bush presidency when Bush announced and implemented steady "devaluation" i.e. conscious monetary inflation.

Liberal beliefs about wealth guides their thinking about Americans being resource and energy pirates, stealing from the rest of the world, especially the Third World. We could not have all that expansion/inflation unless we stole it from other countries.Liberals/Keynesians do know that inflation effectively sucks in to the government the value from holders of the money.

Keynesians/Liberals have split minds. On the one hand they are frantic to have inflation and on the other hand they are appalled at the expanding/inflating USA stealing resources from poor third worlders. Thus they are frantically trying at the same time to expand the American economy by inflation and raging about America starving the less developed countries.

18 posted on 06/26/2012 7:08:17 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
All the trillions that have been papering the world over since 2008 were intended to stave off a deflationary depression, actually have done so and will continue to do so, until either the ability to provide quantitative easing ceases or quantitative easing overshoots the mark into outright inflation breaking out into the broader economy.

What we've seen for the past going on four years has been liquidity finding its way into those areas with reliable demand. There has been speculative excess, driving up commodities and creating a situation with food, oil, precious and industrial metals that is for all intents and purposes inseparable from actual inflation as far as the general public is concerned, as the difference is purely academic. The consequence is the same.

Those areas without reliable demand have suffered. Housing, non-necessary consumer goods, etc. have fallen in value, ie deflated. Stocks are widely suspected of being propped up via government intervention.

Absent the bizarre, almost unfathomable spending spree we've witnessed, we'd be experiencing a deflationary depression far worse than the Great Depression. Technology has enabled the appearance of normalcy, no soup lines, very few people literally forced out into the streets.

As we see with Greece, however, that possibility does still loom. It hasn't been eradicated. Government spending does have a practical limit, even if that limit is imposed from outside.

How all this will ultimately pan out is unknown but there aren't many potential good outcomes. It looks a lot like penury in store for all but the very wealthiest few no matter which way this shakes out, sad to say.

20 posted on 06/26/2012 7:33:13 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

BFL


21 posted on 06/26/2012 7:59:00 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Bump for later...


48 posted on 06/27/2012 6:08:46 PM PDT by Marie Antoinette (:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson