Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory
natural born worked that way under the law in the 50’s, 60’s, 70’s, 80’s, 90’s, 00’s to today.

It was even the case when states individually controlled immigration. born in the usa made a person natural born citizen.

sorry, you're incorrect.

being born on US soil can make someone a US citizen... but NOT NECESSARILY a natural born citizen. if the person was born of foreign national parents, that person would be a dual citizen. OBVIOUSLY not a natural born citizen

the cold hard truth:
a natural born citizen is a citizen naturally, as there are no alternatives.

31 posted on 06/22/2012 11:04:56 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: sten

thank you for pointing out someone born in USA is not necessarily a Natural Born Citizen

People never stop to ask themselves why in our constitution does the ONLY article requiring a Natural Born citizen pertain to our President.
People never stop to ask because they don’t want to accept the truth. our Constitution sets a higher standard for qualificartions of POTUS than it does for any other office


56 posted on 06/22/2012 2:30:28 PM PDT by RWGinger (Simpl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: sten

no the law is clear, direct, and precise. There are only two kinds of citizen. Born and Naturalized. There is zero nuance. Born a citizens is born a citizen without any varriation or nuance. period.

http://www.uscis.gov formerly ins.gov


110 posted on 06/25/2012 8:29:25 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson