Your question is illogical. The man is open about his liberal political leanings.
Don’t tell me about 20 years ago when I am talking about much more current events.
My observation wa a direct response to the following statement:
Juan Williams is, and has always been, an intellectual lightweight.
So, no, you were definitely NOT talking about current events. But, by all means, feel free to make sh-t up, if it's the only way you can defend your seemingly compulsive need to post stupidity here.
Speaking of intelligence, who has more—Williams or Malkin?
I'm not going to dignify that question with a response. It's actually possible to two disagreeing individuals without taking sides against either. If I had to sit next to one on a flight to Sydney, I'd pick Malkin. Actually, I've met her a couple of times. She's cute, but she's a bit too serious for my taste. I prefer Laura Ingraham, who does have a sense of humor, and is quite a bit smarter than Malkin. Thomas, an extremely intelligent man, lists Williams among his closest friends.
And by the way, you don’t have to read my posts.
Thank God for that. But this is still America, so, no, you don't get to tell me what I can and can't read. The truth is your have become tiresome enough that I clicked on the first page of your posts to see if you were CAPABLE of posting something intelligent. I got the answer I expected.
The question was not illogical. You used Williams’ position on Thomas 20 years ago as some kind of marker of “conservative equivalence”, then you could not answer if that was a consistent position since then. Instead, as you usually do, you chose to attack me as being illogical.
Juan always has been an intellectual lightweight. Like a blind squirrel, he finds a nut every once and awhile. But what does he ever add to the conversation? Not much, except to show how incapable he is of not supporting an intellectually honest position.
I did not make THAT up. But that did not prevent you from making up your next statement about my seemingly compulsive” need to post stupidity. Project much?
Then you state you would not dignify my next question with a response, and then proceed to do just that. The name dropping was quite cute—good for you—but who Thomas lists as friends is not responsive to whether Juan is an intellectual lightweight or not. Thomas may just like Juan, who is very likable, but then again, Juan is not paid to be likable. He is a political commentator, one who sees things through a certain set of lenses, and seems incapable of changing those lenses to reflect reality.
I feel so privileged that you took the time away from your navel gazing to tell me how tiresome my posts are. You seem offended that I actually said that you were not compelled to read my posts, especially in the light of your previous statements to me on this and two other threads, that I was so obviously intellectually challenged.
I would tell you to look into the mirror, but I suspect that you do entirely too much of that already, and are overwhelmingly taken with what you see there.