Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ozzymandus; stuartcr
The “kid” attacked him, Einstein. Zimmerman was walking back to his vehicle when the “kid” attacked him.

__________________________________

Please provide proof (such as a neutral witness statement) that Martin attacked Zimmerman.

Zimmerman's injuries prove only that he can't fight (but he sure can scream).They do not prove who started the fight at all.

The witness statements that Zimmerman was on bottom again just prove that he can't fight, not who started the fight.

So, please, provide proof of your statement.

114 posted on 06/12/2012 9:58:47 AM PDT by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: wtc911

As far as I know, you’ve still never even presented a plausible scenario for how Trayvon knew Zimmerman had a gun, before bashing Zimmerman’s head on the concrete.


126 posted on 06/12/2012 10:04:44 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: wtc911

I’m tired of arguing with idiots. If you can’t watch the news by yourself, I’m not going to do your homework for you.


127 posted on 06/12/2012 10:05:41 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: wtc911

“Please provide proof (such as a neutral witness statement) that Martin attacked Zimmerman.

Zimmerman’s injuries prove only that he can’t fight (but he sure can scream).They do not prove who started the fight at all”

I could say the most reasonable supposition from the evidence, including Zimmerman’s version, the medical reports, and eye witness testimony, is that Martin attacked Zimmerman. And it’s not so easy as you think to brush it off as Zimmerman being a bad fighter. He would have had to start the fight and not only lose but also not land a single blow, besides the one from his gun. That is incredible.

My supposition is not proof, but of course you don’t need proof to declare something on the internet. Luckily, the defense does not have to prove Martin started it in court, either, as the burden is on the prosecution.


185 posted on 06/12/2012 10:41:54 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: wtc911; ozzymandus
Please provide proof (such as a neutral witness statement) that Martin attacked Zimmerman.

Whoever threw the first punch started it and since the forensic reports show only Trayvon threw punches that night, then his first punch started it. Since Zimmerman was on the ground disabled by the first punch, every punch that Martin then threw was starting it again and again.

Zimmerman's injuries prove only that he can't fight (but he sure can scream).

Everytime that Zimmerman yelled out for help and Martin refused to call off his assault, Martin was starting it over again and again.

The witness statements that Zimmerman was on bottom again just prove that he can't fight, not who started the fight.

So then if he "can't fight" then why would he have started something that he can't do??? On the other hand, since Trayvon proved that he can fight, we know that he would think nothing of starting a fight, and the broken teeth in his mouth may very well indicate it.

Now return to your hood.

245 posted on 06/12/2012 11:12:05 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson