Replies

If you read what I wrote, then obviously that isn’t at all what I’m saying, it’s what you are saying. When you say someone seems to be saying something, that means you hear what you want, not what was said.

I am saying that if he had stayed in his car as the dispatcher directed, then none of this would have happened.

“if he had stayed in his car as the dispatcher directed”

Good gawd.

Are you really this ignorant and that much of a troll?

And as everyone is pointing out, the dispatcher did not direct him to “stay” in his car.

Good gawd, you get even the most basic facts wrong.......even when the facts are laid out in print and easy to read and comprehend.

I am saying that if he had stayed in his car as the dispatcher directed, then none of this would have happened.

Can you post for us the exact words of the dispatcher that night, where Zimmerman was when he heard them, what his response to those words were, and where he was returning to when Trayvon assaulted him???? Then no more of your uninformed posts will have to happen.

If you read what I wrote, then obviously that isn’t at all what I’m saying, it’s what you are saying. I don't mind if you place blame where it doesn't rest. I will respond as I see fit. If you don't like it, then don't place blame where it doesn't belong.

When you say someone seems to be saying something, that means you hear what you want, not what was said. Nope, but nice try. If you place blame where it doesn't belong, it opens the door to all the reasons why you're wrong. I touched on some of them. You don't like it. Tough. If you don't like getting called on saying something stupid, then don't say something stupid.

I am saying that if he had stayed in his car as the dispatcher directed, then none of this would have happened. Oh really? Is that what you meant? LMAO Yes, that's exactly what you meant. And that is as stupid a thing to say as I have read here in a long time.

If someone is suspicious, you're going to keep him in your sight until he is off the property. The police have no authority to tell you you can't get out of your car from a remote location. If they are on scene and can intervene, a person should defer to them.

This is like an officer telling you you don't have a right to own a gun. "We'll take care of it. Just call us." Ten minutes later when the police cruiser pulls up, you're alread dead.

Lets take the very worst case scenario. I don't think this is what happened by the way. All accounts state that Zimmerman was near his own car, but lets go down the road you seem so anxious to.

Lets say Zimmerman did confront Travon. All Travon had to do was explain what he was doing, perhaps tell Zimmerman where he lived, explain that his dad lived right over there, and it would all have been handled without any problem. Travon obviously became furious and attacked Zimmerman. Where's the outrage directed at Travon for his actions?

The answer in your mind is to always let a possible perp go on down the road. Who cares if they continue to rob units in the complex? At least nobody will get killed? Of course that's until the perp goes into the wrong unit that is occupied, and is confronted. And then a person that wasn't charged with helping out with security, isn't wide awake, and is in a very vulnerable position, is then compromised and very likely to be killed to cover up the crime.

Zimmerman did his community a service, and you're miles off base.

If Travon hadn't become furious, none of this would have happened. Zimmerman had a right to confront if he so desired. If you don't like it, too bad. If the police don't like it, too bad. If the judge doesn't like it, too bad. They will never convict this guy. Deal with it.