Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DManA

“I’d say it was their lack of faith in free markets.”

The financial markets were far less regulated during the bubble than they had been for many decades.

The Commodities Futures Modernization Act of 2000 had been lobbied hard by investment firms that wanted the derivatives market to be unregulated. This prevented the oversight and transparency that Brooksley Born had warned was badly needed.

‘Graham-Leach-Bliley’, the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, undid most of what remained of the Glass Steagall Act. Glass Steagall had walled investment banking off from the “real economy”. After a 65 year hiatus the short term speculative focus of investment banking was reentering the “real economy”.

And added to that, the nature of investment banking had radically changed. Investment banks used to be partnerships, and they were careful because they were investing their own money. But now they were public companies and they were investing Other People’s Money, leading to a casino atmosphere among traders.


103 posted on 06/10/2012 12:49:24 PM PDT by Pelham (Marco Rubio, la Raza's trojan horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham

Can’t trust markets to house people. Must use the power of Government to HELP the people. Markets enrich the rich, government HELPS people.

That is the core belief of all statists.


105 posted on 06/10/2012 1:03:27 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson