Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John D
Even if you do not believe Mormons are not theoretically Christian, I see it hard to say they are anti-Christian.

Lutherans attack Mormons as not being Christian, and Mormons attack all Christian churches, it is why the cult was created.

Next to the sex and money aspects of Mormonism, it was founded to destroy and replace Christianity in America, the Lutheran church included.

You go against the Lutheran/Southern Baptist Christians and choose to defend Mormonism over Christianity.

You have supported Romney in every election cycle, both 2008 and 2012.

Romney even replaced Giuliani for you.

79 posted on 06/02/2012 2:50:48 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12
Mormons attack all Christian churches, it is why the cult was created.

Where and when have Mormons ever attacked any Christian Church? It is the Baptists who are constantly attacking Mormons. They fear them because Mormons stand up for what they believe and are not hypocrites. They say they are against the use of alcohol and they actually do refrain from the use, unlike Baptists. They actually tithe. They go on missions where they save their own money to be used on their missions and help people in need.

You go against the Lutheran/Southern Baptist Christians and choose to defend Mormonism over Christianity.


I do not agree that Mormons are not Christians. I believe that if a person believes in Christ they are a Christian. Mormons do more to help others than any other religion I know of. What does the Baptist church do. Preach fire and brimestone and to fear God. I believe it is better to love and do his deeds than to fear him. I would much rather have my children love me and do what is good than to fear me.

You have supported Romney in every election cycle, both 2008 and 2012. Romney even replaced Giuliani for you.

Yes when he was the best candidate left. Who would you have chosen? The crazy, hot tempered, ineffective McCain, the pardon wielding Huckster, or the anti-American blame America first terrorist loving Paul? Who was the best candidate then? Who is the best now? I wish we still had Cain or Newt, but we do not so we have to support the best candidate left.
80 posted on 06/02/2012 3:40:05 PM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson