[Jeff Head]

Whatever.

I understand and respect why people of good consiceince come to mis-trust and not want to vote for Romney based on his record...though given the alternatives and what he has published he is running on and the commitments he has made thereto to these very prominant people endorsing him, I do not agree with.

I do not respect the idea that folks would reject him purely on a religous basis because that religion, unlike fundamental Islam, is not seeking to establish something like Sharia Law or any other political set of laws and judicailsim law the compels everyone oin the country to either join, pay tribute and conform, be enslaved, or die.

The Constitution is pretty clear about there not being any religious test. I except Islam because of the world-wide political domination it clearly seeks over this mortal earth hiding under the name of religion.

But you do what you gotta do...I will join with these very conservative people endorsing Romney to defeat Obama, the greatest threat to this Republic since the Civil War.

[ansel12]

LOL, you go straight to Islam.

You then try the constitution as though Americans are not legally allowed to look at a Mormon Bishop’s bizarre cult religion because the constitution forbids it.

Then you tell us that you DO want to impose a religious test on Americans who practice Islam.

See, this stuff is part of the political question.

[Elsie]

I understand and respect why people of good consiceince come to mis-trust and not want to vote for Romney based on his record...

I, OTOH, mis-trust and do not want to vote for Romney based on his BELIEFS.

He has no spiritual discernment; or he would NOT be a MORMON.

He is either a DECIEVED mormon, or a DECIEVING mormon.