Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spacejunkie2001
What do you think he’s referring to re; Bennett’s non verification? Just the date question or something else?

That part was me calling Hawaii's verification a non-verification because that's what it is. Hawaii says they have Obama's records on file, but they did not certify those records as accurate or truthful. Hawaii issues birth certificates for anyone who said they witnessed a baby being born there. After a "birth record" has been established, Obama could amend the said record as much he wanted. No doubt in my mind that Hawaii would do what Obama wanted them to do with no questions asked by Hawaii.

238 posted on 05/28/2012 10:30:51 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

I get that; I totally agree it was a non verification since they left the birth date out. Plus they could have submitted the actual DOCUMENT if that imbecile Bennett hadn’t completely let them off the hook.

What I’m asking is, how did the submission from HI open the doors to Zullo for other info? Was it that they’re more able to pin down WHO is the forger?


248 posted on 05/29/2012 5:45:52 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson