Stanley Ann and Obama married.
Part III
Supplemental.
Legitimated children.
23.—(1) A person born out of wedlock and legitimated by the subsequent marriage of his parents shall, as from the date of the marriage or of the commencement of this Act, whichever is later, be treated, for the purpose of determining whether he is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies, or was a British subject immediately before the commencement of this Act, as if he had been born legitimate.
(2) A person shall be deemed for the purposes of this section to have been legitimated by the subsequent marriage of his parents if by the law of the place in which his father was domiciled at the time of the marriage the marriage operated immediately or subsequently to legitimate him, and not otherwise
You CLEARLY do not understand what you are reading. It’s not the first time I have run across this. You didn’t even know you needed to read the definitions.
Section 23 of the Act doesn’t apply. The word SUBSEQUENT means after the birth.
IF Sr married Ann, which is debatable, it wasn’t a valid marriage on the facts as we know them at this time.
In other words, Sr committed bigamy.
So you see, you are absolutely incorrect when you say that marriage doesn’t matter. Obama’s British citizenship hinges on a valid marriage between his mother and his father.. not a VOID marriage.
You have to get into whether Sr was really married to Kezia or anyone else...which is another twist to this.
Your claim that marriage doesn’t matter is WRONG and hopefully you will cease posting this incorrect info.