Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Charles Henrickson
So do you DEFEND Roe v. Wade??

No, I ignore it, just like I ignore Dred Scott.

It's nothing more than an immoral, unconstitutional court opinion in one particular case.

Romney, on the other hand, being the anti-constitution, anti-republican judicial supremacist that he is, thinks courts make laws.

But they don't. Article One, Section One of the Constitution grants that power only to the Congress.

The cold hard fact is that Romney's position, even constantly modified as it has been for political purposes, remains that of a pro-choice democrat.

26 posted on 05/26/2012 9:37:22 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Party like it's 1860.- America's Party - www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance; Longbow1969; Drew68; Innovative; altura
So do you DEFEND Roe v. Wade??

No, I ignore it. . . . It's nothing more than an immoral, unconstitutional court opinion. . . .

So you IGNORE an unconstitutional court opinion, which could be overturned with a good SC appointment or two, which in turn would be the biggest pro-life victory we've had ever since abortion became legal. You thereby prove your irrelevance.

32 posted on 05/26/2012 10:06:21 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Constitutional and social conservative Republican who wants to win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson