Replies

Paul Rondeau, executive director of American Life League, told the Register that nobody knows if Romney's staff investigated all the products that Teva manufactures before the fundraiser was held. Rondeau added that it is also unknown whether the actual donors present at the fundraiser were pro-life. Rondeau also said it was his understanding that the fundraiser did not involve any money from Teva.
. . . Rondeau of the American Life League noted that, in 2005, then-Gov. Romney vetoed a bill that would have required hospitals in Massachusetts to offer the morning-after pill to rape victims, as well as requiring pharmacies to sell them without a prescription. The Massachusetts Legislature later overrode Romney's veto.

While it is right to question the wisdom of Romney's fundraiser, Rondeau said there was still "no question" that Obama is the "abortion president". . . .

That's about where I am on this right now. I think that that fundraiser could have been handled better to make clear this was not a "pro-abortion event." But Romney is campaigning on a pro-life platform, calling for the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Plus, we know what Obama is.

But Romney is campaigning on a pro-life platform, calling for the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Romney is "running" on a judicial supremacist, pro-choice democrat, pro-choice for states, platform vis a vis life. It's right on his own website.