So what? This (lingerie)is mechandise to make a living, the other is provactive sex by a live woman. Apples and oranges!!!
The irony just kind of jumps out, at least to me. Like someone working for a Dole getting fired for drinking apple or orange juice. Personally i would have to see the wardrobe in question to determine if it was “provocative sex” I haven’t seen the evidence. They seem to have more of a problem with her large breasts. I guess she concealed them for the job interview. But why would one conceal large breast when applying for a job at a lingerie plant. Seems like that would be a plus to me.
However, with Gloria Alred involved, it certainly raises an eyebrow. I’ll wait for more evidence to make an informed decision.