Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/20/2012 7:57:18 AM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Qbert
this has the potential to make the big dig look like chump change. the kick backs are irresistible to politicians
2 posted on 05/20/2012 8:02:29 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Sure glad Governor Scott killed the Tampa to Orlando high speed rail boondoggle.


3 posted on 05/20/2012 8:11:24 AM PDT by RightWingConspirator (Obamanation--the most corrupt regime since Robert Mugabe's Zimbabwe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

the majority of the state gets what they deserve...they keep voting for the Marxists.

the minority are leaving in droves taking their wealth and businesses(jobs) with them....California will be the new Greece.

my own current state of NY Sucks...but it is no where near the idiocy of California.


4 posted on 05/20/2012 8:16:59 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

The problem here has nothing to do with high-speed rail technology. AFter all, there re a number of places in the world where these things have been built, work just fine, and everybody loves them. But nothing major will be built in our society until a serious public reaction takes place against NIMBYism. It needs to be made uncool, like smoking.

Search the history of the George Lucas studio debacle for an illustrative case.


5 posted on 05/20/2012 8:33:14 AM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
Oh come on.

Who wouldn't want the taxpayers of this once-Golden State to pay a mere 100 billion so that by 2020, someone in a hurry could pay twice (or more) as much as driving in order to save a half-hour (not counting parking, ticketing, security which would add back over an hour) to travel between the California cultural and population centers of Merced and Bakersfield?

.

7 posted on 05/20/2012 9:13:15 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

As long as the liberals think they can convince you to give them more money, they will try.


8 posted on 05/20/2012 9:16:31 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Major seismic zone California.


11 posted on 05/20/2012 10:25:41 AM PDT by Poincare (Reality is not a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

It’s called the Browndoggle.


12 posted on 05/20/2012 10:26:42 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
and there is no revenue plan that would make the train profitable.

When the government builds a transportation system, it is never profitable. It is always subsidized by the taxpayers! The costs to build it are just the beginning of an entrenched system to bilk taxpayers for generations to come. Every transportation system run by government in California is heavily subsidized by taxpayers; look at Caltrain, SamTrans (San Mateo) and Muni (San Francisco) as examples that are more than two-thirds subsidized by taxpayers. High-speed rail will certainly be subsidized to an even greater extent than two-thirds because the fares will never be high enough to cover running costs. And it will fail because operating costs will drain the state budget at an alarming rate.

13 posted on 05/20/2012 10:48:41 AM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson