[John D]

. That said, I don't care for Romney much either and only prefer him to Paul because he doesn't support legalizing drugs and prostitution and isn't a whacko on foreign policy.

And he doesn't want to experiment with perverts in the military, does not endorse OWS, does not blame every problem in the world on America, does not fill every bill around with as many earmarks as possible, does not endorse the likes of Cynthia McKinney, does not want to see Israel destroyed, is not a racist and does not want to destroy our military.

I am with you, Romney is not ideal, but comparing him with the surrender monkey is like comparing Reagan to Jimmy Carter.

Cut and Run follows the democrat philosophies to the hilt.

[Pinkbell]

Yes, those points too.

Ron Paul is one of those Republicans, although Liber(al)tarian is the more accurate word, that Democrats and liberals would be okay with when it comes to foreign policy and many social issues, this is with the exception of Ron Paul’s opposition to Roe vs. Wade (sared doctrine in lib circles). They would struggle with him from an economic standpoint (although he is hypocritical considering the earmarks), and his racist Stormfront supporters would be a negative as well to people on both sides of the aisle.