It is easy to put up a chart of what someone (PURPORTS) to believe/espouse; it is something else to provide concrete examples of same. To wit: "Believes the constitution restricts the government from infringing on inalienable right" which the chart "claims" both Dear Leader and Mittens disagrees with this sacred belief.
Barack Hussein ObamaObama n a 2001 interview on Chicago’s public radio station WBEZ FM
"If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be OK.
But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.
I'm certain you have documents which show Romney uttering something similarly damaging to prove the contention that he is of the same mindset as O'Bummer?
By the way, while abortion and same sex marriage are important issues, as is the economy, as a Vet I am more CONCERNED with first and foremost, the survival of our Republic by allowing Stealth Jihad to go unchallenged if not thrive by refusing to forcefully attacking it and in fact, appointing members of Islamist Organizations who have ties to the Mooselimb Brotherhood as "Advisers" and confidants within the White House, DHS, DOJ, DOD, etc.
I suppose you and others have examples of Mitt pandering, appeasing, defending and supporting Islamo-Fascists as well as comments condemning Israel while propping up and financing the terrorist group Palistinian Authority?
Also no doubt you have evidence that Romney would do the same as O'Bummer did and issue an edict ORDERING the DOD, FBI, DHS, et al, to "scrub" all "offensive" training material which in any way was considered "insentitive" or "islamophobe" thus emasculating and denigrating our military and counterintelligence personnel in our efforts to combat terrorism?
Morevover, I'm sure you have examples of Mitt TRASHING the United States (overseas among our enemies) as has Dear Leader, numerous times?
You want me to continue?
I could go on and on, but I'll give you (or any of your buds) the opportunity to begin with these and we'll go from there.
Mitts admits he's a Dim, by Mitt himself.