“In fact, the only thing Dewhurst campaign has said that could be construed as negative was the truth that Cruz is overzealously representing his client with appeals in a court case his client lost involving Cruz’ client stealing an American Company’s business property.”
First, that is NOT the only allegation dewhurst has made.
Second, Dewhurst campaign has been relentlessly unfair and negative towards Cruz, making mountains out of the molehill of legal representation by Cruz’ lawfirm.
- because Cruz worked for some time in a large lawfirm and some of the other lawyers gave money to Democrat causes, Cruz was attacked for being a puppet of Soros. This is ABSURD guilt by association.
- second, the above “Cruz’ client” is a lie. It was a client of Cruz’ lawfirm and he was not involved in the decisions Dewhurst accuses him of. Basically, Cruz is being accused of the professional work of others in the lawfirm.
the Dewhurst smear machine is the main thing he has going right now.
“Dewhurst has done all he could to limit the taxes and spending. “
Those who observe the lege and see how the Senate goes ‘soft’ on House initiatives know this not to be the case.
Your post does not contain the whole story on Cruz’ firm representation of the client who stole the American Company’s business property, and you have no knowledge of the level of Cruz personal involvement in that case. For you to claim otherwise is a lie.
Cruz and his supporters are in fact the ones who have run a relentlessly negative campaign against Dewhurst.
But, I will not be drawn into opening fire on Cruz because I don’t want to damage the future elective office prospects of a republican who may prove to be as fine a conservative as Dewhurst when he finds the appropriate office to run for.