Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So, in the 3rd-world context, breast feeding to the age of 5 makes sense. In the context of the rest of the world, though, it doesn’t. Breasts are sex objects. You favor public breast-feeding? Breastfeeding at work? I am asking myself who’s the weirdo.


17 posted on 05/11/2012 12:09:18 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Clara Lou

Breasts are for feeding the young, you have assigned an extra use.


27 posted on 05/11/2012 12:15:18 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou
hmm ~ sex objects ~ lots of things are sex objects if you look at them that way. There was once a "Hello Kitty' vibrator.

Lasted about 2 minutes into the first phone call to the company headquarters.

Breasts provide lactic fluids to young'ns. Simultaneously they are made up of some degree of erectile tissue ~ and are tied into the nervous system with a special link that does all sorts of things.

However, the purpose is the purpose. The rest of that stuff keeps you in her tree and not somebody else's tree!

Remember, in nature all genes have multiple purposes. Else you'd be a sea slug.

32 posted on 05/11/2012 12:19:40 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson