Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rogue yam; GOPsterinMA
I agree with you and not with the conventional wisdom of the pundits that it's going to be close. Sometime before the election it will break and I believe it will break decisively for Romney. That prediction comes with a reservation, however, that there is no October Surprise.

But just to play the game if it stays close: Obviously Ohio is the Keystone state, not Pennsylvania, for purposes of handicapping the electoral college vote. With Ohio all things are possible for Romney and without it it will take a near miracle to win for two reasons: First, he must cobble something together with Wisconsin and Nevada or some such combination. Second, the loss of Ohio means that Romney's message is not resonating and he is likely to lose places like Iowa, Virginia, Colorado, and Nevada and it will be very unlikely that he could under the circumstances pick up the odd state like Wisconsin plus one to substitute for Ohio. On the other hand, this tendency will also run the other way if his campaign gathers the momentum both you and I expect it will then Romney is likely to pick up Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania and run pass 300 electoral votes.

We have seen several straws in the wind blowing in Romney's direction: First, North Carolina has now become a virtual lock for Romney; Second, Romney has just pulled up even in Ohio; Rasmussen has now been joined by two other polls showing Romney in a virtual tie in Ohio; the primary results in Wisconsin look very favorable for the Republicans; even the fiasco in the Democrat primary in West Virginia signals an incipient revolt in Democrat ranks; a look at the map reminds me that West Virginia abuts Ohio; Rasmussen has got Romney up 4 or 5 points nationally in the three-day rolling average poll of likely voters and the states have not yet been freshly pulled to bring the trends up to date which undoubtedly will show marked improvement for Romney.

Obama has not been able to sound a Chord which resonates. He has failed in his attempt to separate women from the Catholic Church, for example. The youth vote remains apathetic compared to 2008, as does the Hispanic vote. The momentum is clearly with Romney.

Finally, Goldman Sachs is just downgraded its GDP expectations to 1.9%. The employment numbers this week are just as anemic as last week, although they have not received media attention. Gasoline prices are holding at a very high level and if they come down it probably means that they are coming down in price because demand in a weakened economy is reduced. There is, therefore, virtually no hope of a palpable improvement in our living standard before the election which would prompt the voters to give Obama an opportunity to stay the course and certainly nothing to impel them to reward Obama for a job well done.


11 posted on 05/10/2012 10:48:55 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; BillyBoy; LS; ...

I agree with you regarding how OH will be the key to winning the presidency in 2012. If Romney carries it, Obama would have to run the table in NH, IA, CO, NV, NM, WI, MN, PA and MI to get reelected (which won’t happen). And if Obama carries OH, then Romney wouldn’t stand a chance in other blue-collar Great Lakes states such as PA, MI, WI and MN (which are less Republican than OH) and would have to win 4 out of 5 of NH, IA, CO, NV, NM (with one of them being CO, unless Romney also wins the ME-02, in which case he could win with NH, IA, NV and NM).

This is one of the reasons why I think that Romney would be foolish not to select Senator Rob Portman of OH as his runningmate. Portman will help him carry OH and would also help him attract blue-collar voters and motivate Evangelical voters in other key states (Portman is a socially conservative Methodist, and is an expert at communicating with working-class voters due to his work experience and political campaigns).

Romney-Portman could garner 350 electoral votes if the election breaks further away from Obama (which is a real possibility). But, more importantly, Romney-Portman can get 270 electoral votes even if it doesn’t.


42 posted on 05/11/2012 7:23:40 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson